The Democratic Party’s stunning domination in Texas on Tuesday began with the promise of one candidate, James Talarico.
After decades of Republican rule, his well-funded, disciplined and scandal-free U.S. Senate campaign helped convince voters that winning was possible this time. He soon had help.
Gina Hinojosa, a little-known state lawmaker who had appeared destined for defeat when she challenged Gov. Greg Abbott, emphasized the issue of data centers, sitting in the living rooms of conservatives angry about the massive, noisy, energy-guzzling facilities. She promised a halt.
Behind them both was the deepest bench of Democratic candidates assembled in decades in Texas. Transcending any single person, the party built quiet momentum with voters fed up with rising prices and unmoved by Republican warnings that voting for Democrats would signal the end of Texas as they knew it.
With Democrats poised to occupy nearly every statewide office — a tectonic shift — top campaign advisers, newly elected leaders, party operatives and strategists described in interviews how Mr. Talarico’s campaign had galvanized voters and fueled improbable triumphs.
They also credited a yearslong organizing effort and the party’s success at fielding candidates for nearly every race — all 150 state House districts, every statewide office, every state board of education position and every major judicial race. The Republican Party in Texas did not do the same, leaving some Democrats with uncontested seats.
“This is the first year where we really had a machine built,” said Katherine Fischer, the executive director of the Texas Majority PAC, which worked with the Texas Democratic Party to run and train candidates. “We filled every single state and federal seat for the first time in state history of either party.”
By Wednesday, the scale of Democratic success was so great that it appeared likely to propel a legislative candidate in Fort Worth’s conservative suburbs to victory despite having suspended her campaign over questions about whether a conviction could disqualify her.
The results surprised even winning candidates, who were in a state of elated shock on Tuesday night.
“I had no idea what was going to happen. Frankly, none of us did,” said Sarah Eckhardt, the comptroller-elect, as she stood in a Whataburger restaurant in Austin packed with jubilant Democrats.
Mr. Talarico and Ms. Hinojosa, who will be the state’s first Latina governor, sat at a table and toasted with orange-and-white soda cups as giddy supporters cheered and snapped photos.
“We’re in a realignment that goes beyond party,” Ms. Eckhardt added. “That’s what’s happening here.”
Republican Party leaders had long assumed that the only threats to their power were from the right, even as Texas became a landing pad for transplants and immigrants, its cosmopolitan urban centers ballooning to include five of the nation’s 15 largest cities.
That assumption that moving right was always the right move led Ken Paxton, a scandal-scarred attorney general, to challenge and defeat Senator John Cornyn in the primary. It also allowed Bo French, a brazenly anti-Muslim candidate, to become the party’s nominee for oil and gas regulator. He complained publicly about the number of South Asians at the University of Texas. He lost.
The long rightward lurch had not been a problem for Republican officials. Then, on Tuesday, the lurch back swept most of them away.
The Democratic Party’s candidates, especially in statewide races, stuck to a consistent middle-of-the-road message, promising to address cost-of-living concerns and to curtail cultural battles that have consumed Texas politics for years.
For many, including Ms. Hinojosa, the biggest challenge was being taken seriously, especially by major donors.
“It was really hard to get people to believe in this race,” said Amy Friedman, her campaign manager. “It was a slog to get our first million. It was a slog to get the next two.”
By contrast, Republicans leaned into culture wars that had seemed potent just two years before. They believed they had easy targets in Ms. Hinojosa and Mr. Talarico, who had spoken publicly about gender, race and equity.
“Some people know him as ‘Tofu Talarico.’ Some people call him ‘Six Gender Jimmy,’” said Mr. Paxton on the night of his primary victory in March. “I’ve even heard some people even call him James Talafreako.”
That nickname stuck, but not as Mr. Paxton expected.
At a Houston rally the next day, Mr. Talarico told supporters that they could buy a T-shirt declaring “I’m a Talafreako.” More than 43,000 did, netting his campaign more than $1 million.
The nimble response — parrying rather than counterpunching — captured the instincts of his campaign. Mr. Talarico stuck relentlessly to a core message: Texas politics was dominated by billionaires and politicians like Mr. Paxton who had served their own interests at the expense of ordinary Texans.
Mr. Talarico navigated fraught moments in his speeches, often germinating in iPhone notes shared with his 26-year-old speechwriter, Antonio Esparza.
On Sept. 10, 2025, the day after Mr. Talarico announced his Senate run, he learned that Charlie Kirk, the conservative activist, had been assassinated. He was at his Austin home with Mr. Esparza when they decided to directly address the killing at a planned rally that night, “instead of running from it,” Mr. Esparza said.
They wrote a speech as they drove to a San Antonio rally in Mr. Talarico’s pickup, driven by another aide, each on his own laptop in a shared document, typing as they headed down Interstate 35.
“I disagreed with Charlie Kirk on almost every political issue, but Charlie Kirk was a child of God,” Mr. Talarico, a former seminarian, said in the speech. “He was our sibling, our brother. He was a human being.”
A video of the remarks, clipped and shared on social media, spread widely.
“I’ll never forget being in that truck,” Mr. Esparza said.
The approach underscored what Mr. Talarico presented in his campaign as a commitment to bipartisanship, to faith and to getting beyond divisions. He hammered home that message to audiences listening to hourlong podcasts. He delivered it in person around the state, first with town halls where he took questions and then in speeches to thousands.
The message of ending division and transcending partisanship united the ticket in 2026. It was repeated by candidates like Taylor Rehmet, a union machinist uncomfortable with party labels, who flipped a State Senate seat in a deep-red district in Tarrant County in a January special election and held onto the seat on Tuesday. It was also part of Ms. Hinojosa’s victory speech in Austin.
“Whether you’re a Democrat, a Republican or neither,” Ms. Hinojosa said, “hear what Texas said today, loud and clear: Your government belongs to you.”
Ms. Hinojosa at first struggled to gain attention, but she often met with individual voters, and spent time trying to understand issues like data centers before becoming among the most prominent Texas politicians to support a moratorium.
“We had months of meetings before that rollout,” said Ms. Friedman, the campaign manager. Ms. Hinojosa wanted to talk to people directly affected and to know where labor organizations stood.
Democrats also had to regain support from Latino voters. They did so by not taking it for granted, said Regina Montoya, a board member of the Latino Victory Fund political action committee. She recalled Mr. Talarico visiting her at home in Dallas last year as he embarked on his campaign. They shared breakfast tacos.
“He was there to listen,” Ms. Montoya said. “He promised then that he would work hard to earn the votes of Latinos.”
Mr. Talarico accomplished that also through deft use of social media, courting influencers while he was running in a tough Democratic primary.
“His skill is being genuine, and this is not like an ideology thing. It’s like a personality thing,” said Carlos Espina, a Texas-based progressive influencer who makes videos in Spanish. Mr. Espina, who has said he was not paid by the campaign for his videos backing Mr. Talarico, also said the bipartisan message resonated with Latinos.
“We don’t say, ‘Oh, it’s Democrat and Republican,’” he said. “This is a right or wrong thing. Like, should you be treating people this way as human beings?”
The Democrats at the top of the ticket also magnified each other through joint appearances, introducing one another to new audiences. Mr. Talarico teamed up for events with Ms. Hinojosa and with Bobby Pulido, a well-known Tejano singer who flipped a congressional district in the Rio Grande Valley on Tuesday.
And Democrats also had one major, if unintentional, benefactor: President Trump, who visited the state repeatedly, reminding voters of why he was unpopular.
“The biggest thanks have to go to Donald Trump,” said Cristóbal Alex, who helped advise a super PAC supporting Mr. Talarico.
He said the president’s endorsement of Mr. Paxton could have made them a powerful Republican force. Instead, he said, it backfired.
“It’s like the two of them are part of this political A team,” Mr. Alex said. “Except the A team was the C team.”
The post The Machine, and the Messaging, That Won Texas for Democrats appeared first on New York Times.
