The ABC television network on Thursday issued a rigorous defense of its right to broadcast, accusing the Federal Communications Commission of threatening its station licenses as part of a campaign of “unconstitutional retaliation and coercion.”
Its accusation came in a formal response to a highly unusual move by the F.C.C. in April ordering ABC to apply to renew its broadcasting licenses years before they were set to expire. The request from the agency raised the possibility that the Trump administration would seek to strip one of the nation’s original broadcasters of its television stations.
The network’s response, made in a filing with the agency, contained ABC’s formal renewal applications and sets the stage for a high-profile showdown between the Trump administration and ABC over free speech, censorship and political bias.
In its filing, the network said it was submitting the applications under duress, and that the timing of the F.C.C.’s demand “makes the retaliatory purpose unmistakable.” The order had come just after President Trump and the first lady, Melania Trump, called for the firing of the ABC late-night host Jimmy Kimmel over a joke he told about them in a monologue.
Brendan Carr, the F.C.C. chairman, has denied the connection. Rather, he said, the agency was acting out of concern that ABC was not fully cooperating with an F.C.C. investigation into its diversity and inclusion policies.
In a statement late Thursday, Mr. Carr reiterated that stand, saying ABC was failing to take seriously the agency’s examination of allegations that ABC had acted “in violation of federal nondiscrimination laws,” which ABC denies.
“The F.C.C. will follow the facts and law wherever they may lead,” he said.
The filing is the second time this month that ABC, which is owned by the Walt Disney Company, had accused the F.C.C. of violating its free speech rights because of what it has called “speech the government does not like.” (The earlier accusation came in a standoff over a smaller regulatory matter involving political appearances on “The View.”) Mr. Trump has attacked the network for years, and even sued ABC in 2024. Walt Disney, its parent company, paid $15 million to settle that lawsuit ahead of Mr. Trump’s second inauguration.
The filing made on Thursday focuses on the eight stations the network owns in major markets including New York, Los Angeles and Philadelphia. (It provides programming to more than 240 other stations owned by others.)
The application starts the clock for a process that could culminate in a trial before an administrative law judge or a hearing before the full commission, which Mr. Carr controls.
It is exceedingly hard for the government to revoke station licenses under the law, and the process for trying to do so would likely outlast Mr. Trump’s presidency. But a hearing could come much sooner, giving Mr. Trump and Mr. Carr, his lead attacker against the major networks, a high-profile venue at which to hurl accusations of bias against a presidential media bête noire.
In a public notice issued earlier Thursday, the agency emphasized the rights it has to enforce the so-called “public interest standards” for broadcast stations.
The standards require stations to provide candidates running for the same political office equal time on non-news shows, to refrain from indecent content, and to provide a certain amount of children’s programming each week.
Since assuming the F.C.C. chairmanship at the start of Mr. Trump’s presidency, Mr. Carr has accused the networks of having a liberal bias that could by itself place them in violation of the public interest standards — raising hackles from free-speech advocates and, most recently, ABC itself.
But the F.C.C.’s public notice asserted that the agency’s authority was a “supple instrument” that could be used to force compliance, and that it had flexibility in deciding when and how to apply its powers, including by calling upon stations to apply for their licenses early.
In its filing, ABC noted that the F.C.C. had not called for an early station renewal in more than 50 years, and that it had never done so for an entire group of network-owned stations at once.
“This effort to suppress speech under the guise of bureaucratic process must not prevail,” the network wrote, calling upon the agency to “rescind the order.”
In his statement on Thursday, Mr. Carr said that the order for ABC to apply early for its licenses came after the F.C.C. “informed the company that their responses to the agency’s investigation had been disingenuous, deficient and improper.”
But ABC said in its application package that it had supplied all requested documents, numbering in the thousands. It said no one at the agency had indicated that the F.C.C. found its cooperation to be insufficient before the F.C.C. issued its order.
The F.C.C. could grant renewals of ABC’s licenses. But if Mr. Carr decides against renewing them, he would have to hold a hearing on the issue either before the agency’s administrative law judge, or before a gathering of the full commission, which currently has two Republicans — Mr. Carr and Olivia Trusty — and one Democrat, Anna Gomez.
Even then, ABC would be able to appeal up to the federal court circuit, opening an entirely new round of litigation. The process could take several years, and ABC would maintain its right to broadcast on its stations as it played out.
But the process would leave a cloud over the network’s future finances, as its stations are important revenue generators. Already, the network said, it was given an unusually short amount of time to draft applications for eight stations. It said it had asked for a 60-day extension “to ensure a more orderly and thorough diligence process” but the agency “denied the request without explanation.”
Jim Rutenberg is a writer at large for The Times and The New York Times Magazine and writes most often about media and politics.
The post ABC Accuses Trump Administration of Threatening Its Broadcast Licenses appeared first on New York Times.
