DNYUZ
No Result
View All Result
DNYUZ
No Result
View All Result
DNYUZ
Home News

Supreme Court’s new trick clears path for Trump’s ‘blatant violations’: legal scholar

September 7, 2026
in News
Supreme Court’s new trick clears path for Trump’s ‘blatant violations’: legal scholar

The Supreme Court has a new way to hand President Donald Trump victories that threatens to leave “blatant” lawbreaking unchecked, a legal scholar warned.

Erwin Chemerinsky, the dean of the University of California, Berkeley School of Law, laid out the warning during an interview with Slate’s Amicus podcast. Rather than deciding whether Trump’s actions are lawful, the court’s conservative majority has been increasingly tossing lawsuits against him on procedural grounds and deciding no one has the right to sue in the first place, Chemerinsky warned.

“If no one has the ability to go to court to challenge something, then the illegal and unconstitutional action will continue,” Chemerinsky said.

He pointed to the court’s emergency-docket order last week in the case over the demolition of the White House East Wing and Trump’s roughly $600 million ballroom project. A 5-4 majority threw out the challenge on standing and ruled that the plaintiff who objected had suffered no real injury. Chemerinsky noted that no justice in the majority claimed the project itself was legal.

Chemerinsky tied the ruling to a case from the prior week over Trump’s attempt to reshape federal election procedures, which the Supreme Court also dismissed on standing and ripeness grounds.

“The most blatant constitutional violations will go unchecked unless there’s a court to say no,” Chemerinsky warned. “The reason we give courts the power to strike down executive and legislative acts is the limits of the Constitution are meaningless unless there’s someone there to enforce them.”

He pointed out that the maneuver was a quiet one because procedural rulings draw less attention and public backlash.

“That doesn’t resonate with people. It’s too abstract,” Chemerinsky said. “So if the Supreme Court would have handed down a ruling on Monday saying destroying the East Wing and building the ballroom is constitutional and legal, that would have, of course, gotten more headlines.”

The post Supreme Court’s new trick clears path for Trump’s ‘blatant violations’: legal scholar appeared first on Raw Story.

How to Straddle the MAGA Divide
News

How to Straddle the MAGA Divide

by New York Times
October 25, 2026

Just after 11 a.m. on Oct. 6, a voice of the Trump resistance filled Courtroom 21 of the federal district ...

Read more
News

Scientists Trapped an Antimatter Particle for Months to Study Its Secrets

October 25, 2026
News

Ukrainian soldiers surprised a major drone maker with how much explosive weight they packed onto one of its drones

October 25, 2026
News

24-year-old Coast Guard swimmer says he fought waves and darkness to rescue 16 people from ocean

October 25, 2026
News

Trump suffers late-night anger spell over Obama speech: ‘A grossly incompetent President!’

October 25, 2026

An inventor who led an exercise class on his 103rd birthday, and other lives we lost

October 25, 2026
How ‘The Curious Case of Benjamin Button’ Grew Up

How ‘The Curious Case of Benjamin Button’ Grew Up

October 25, 2026
Maybe We All Need an A.I. Wife

Maybe We All Need an A.I. Wife

October 25, 2026

DNYUZ © 2026

No Result
View All Result

DNYUZ © 2026