FBI Director Kash Patel filed a $250 million defamation lawsuit against The Atlantic and its writer Sarah Fitzpatrick, over their report documenting his alleged drinking problem and absenteeism.
Patel’s legal team claimed the article was “replete with false and obviously fabricated allegations,” despite The Atlantic cited more than two dozen sources — including current and former FBI officials.
The article alleged Patel rescheduled meetings to recover from intoxication and was frequently unreachable.
In the Public Notice Substack, Analyst Lisa Needham argues Patel’s only favorable outcome is having the case dismissed immediately, as proceeding to discovery would expose his legal team to damaging evidence. She contends Patel’s complaint mirrors President Donald Trump’s media disputes and appears poorly drafted.
“Patel didn’t file this lawsuit to win,” Needham writes.
“He filed it to show Trump that he’s not just a dilettante flying around on the FBI jet, but a loyal crony who’s fighting back against the fake news media.”
Needham concludes Patel cannot show The Atlantic fabricated the allegations and lacks genuine confidence in his legal position.
Watch the video below.
Your browser does not support the video tag.
The post Patel’s lawsuit against The Atlantic deemed a bad idea, according to analyst appeared first on Raw Story.
