On July 1, Bosnia and Herzegovina will face the United States at San Francisco Bay Area Stadium in the World Cup’s round of 32. It is an extraordinary sporting story. Thirty years after a war shattered the country, Bosnia’s players have, for the first time, reached the knockout stage of the tournament. Yet this achievement alone does not explain why Bosnians from St. Louis to Stockholm and Sarajevo to Sydney are so invested in the team’s success. Almost overnight, the team has come to embody an alternative future for a country still wracked by nationalistic politics.
For all intents and purposes, this is a team that should not exist. In 1995, more than 8,000 Bosnian men and boys were killed during the Srebrenica genocide. Several of the players who will take the field for Bosnia this week are the children of survivors of that genocide. Others are children of families who were displaced by ethnic cleansing. Players like Esmir Bajraktarević belong to a generation born abroad because their parents escaped unimaginable violence and rebuilt their lives in places they had never expected to call home. Born in Wisconsin to parents from Srebrenica, Bajraktarević has spoken about carrying Bosnia’s painful history “in his blood.”
It’s also reflected in the culture surrounding the team. The lyrics of Dubioza Kolektiv’s unofficial World Cup anthem “I Am from Bosnia – Take Me to America,” are catchy and humorous, but also bear the ring of truth. The song’s refrain, “Take me to the Golden Gate; I will assimilate,” captures the paradox of Bosnia’s modern identity. The diaspora created by war has, ironically, become one of Bosnia and Herzegovina’s greatest national strengths. Young men raised in the United States, Sweden, Austria, Germany, the Netherlands, and elsewhere have chosen to represent a country they first knew through family stories of pain and loss. Their commitment is a reminder that national identity is about more than birthplace. It is about belonging.
For more than thirty years, Bosnia and Herzegovina’s political life has been organized around the management of ethnic difference. The Dayton Peace Accords ended the war in 1995 but also embedded ethnicity as the organizing principle of politics. That compromise secured peace. Over time, however, it has rewarded politicians who seek office on the basis of ethnic identity rather than competence, and who remain in power by spreading fear and discord.
The national football team operates according to an entirely different principle. Nobody earns a place in the squad because of their ethnicity. Players are selected because they are the best. Position is earned through high performance. Authority rests with manager Sergej Barbarez, the former Bosnia and Herzegovina international player, whose task is to build the strongest possible team, not balance competing political constituencies. On the pitch, Bosnia and Herzegovina becomes something its politics has too rarely allowed it to be: a meritocracy.
The team also embodies a civic ideal largely absent from Bosnia’s politics. It represents one country rather than competing constituent peoples and ethnicities, helping to explain why it resonates so deeply across Bosnia and among its diaspora.
Watching the players—and the jubilant crowds of every background who filled the streets after qualification—one cannot help noticing that they have achieved something Bosnia’s political class still struggles to imagine: a vision of the country based on common purpose.
On the pitch, players do not pass the ball to a fellow Muslim Bosniak, Orthodox Serb, or Catholic Croat. They pass to the teammate best placed to score for their country. That sounds obvious. In a political system organized around division, it is revolutionary.
Reports that authorities in some predominantly Serb-controlled towns have sought to discourage or restrict public screenings and celebrations of the national team’s World Cup run are revealing. A football team capable of bringing citizens together poses a challenge to a political project built on keeping people apart.
Every spontaneous celebration beneath the flag of Bosnia and Herzegovina challenges the central claim of ethnic nationalists: that the country’s people have no meaningful future together. But as someone put it, a politics that fears joy is deeply insecure.
Football cannot resolve Bosnia and Herzegovina’s constitutional deadlock. It cannot reform institutions, strengthen the rule of law, or reverse the exodus of young people seeking opportunity abroad. It would be naïve to think it could.
But it can show that merit can prevail and that when citizens unite around a common purpose, they are stronger than any narrow political project.
Across Bosnia and its diaspora, children are discovering heroes whose greatest achievement is not simply winning football matches, but showing that talent matters more than identity and that leadership can unite rather than divide. This generation of Bosnian footballers—Džeko, Lukić, Dedić, Vasilj, and many others—has inherited the memory of war without inheriting its backward logic.
Whatever happens on the pitch, these players have already changed their country. Not because they have reached the last 32 of a World Cup, but because they have shown that Bosnia’s future need not be imprisoned by its past. For ninety minutes at a time, they have offered a vision of Bosnia and Herzegovina in which merit outweighs division, trust overcomes fear, and a shared civic identity is allowed to flourish.
That is more than a football lesson. It is a political one. May it prevail.
The post Bosnia and Herzegovina’s World Cup Team Is Already Changing the Country’s Story appeared first on TIME.
