BRUSSELS — The Pentagon will conduct a six-month review of troop levels in Europe as it seeks to scale back its military footprint and shift more of the U.S. role at NATO to European allies, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth told his counterparts in Brussels on Thursday.
The U.S. plan, and questions about it, are at the center of talks at a meeting of defense ministers at NATO headquarters on Thursday, as the Trump administration seeks to curtail the forces and equipment that the United States has dedicated to protecting the continent for decades.
Along with reviewing its troop posture, the U.S. will cut the number of fighter jets, reconnaissance drones and warships that it would activate for Europe in case of war or a crisis, two diplomats said, speaking on the condition of anonymity to share sensitive details.
The move is set to pull back about a third of U.S. fighter jets and some other assets that European nations would struggle to backfill, such as strategic bombers, the diplomats said. NATO officials are working out which countries can fill some of those gaps and how fast.
The reduction in U.S. forces available to Europe in wartime takes effect immediately, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte said Thursday, noting that it is a cut to the U.S. contribution to NATO’s response to an attack rather than the existing U.S. military footprint in Europe.
European officials have pledged to take more responsibility, and especially in Eastern Europe, officials still call the Western alliance a crucial bulwark against Russia as it wages war in Ukraine and incursions into NATO airspace test its resolve.
The linchpin of NATO is its collective defense clause, Article 5, which declares that an attack on one ally is an attack on all — a pledge that President Donald Trump has cast doubt on, saying repeatedly that he did not believe European allies would help the United States in a crisis.
In fact, the only time Article 5 was invoked was in response to the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attack on the United States, and twisted metal from the wreckage of New York’s World Trade Center stands outside the main entrance to NATO’s headquarters.
Even with the plans for reductions, the U.S. has tens of thousands of troops and nuclear warheads stationed across Europe and remains deeply enmeshed in NATO’s command and control. An American also holds the role of supreme allied commander, Europe — NATO’s top uniformed military position.
Hegseth said the Trump administration would be “honest” with Washington’s once closest allies about their need to take over and transform the NATO alliance that has been the cornerstone of American security policy in Europe since the end of World War II.
But the Pentagon chief also scolded the Europeans at the start of the meeting of NATO’s 32 defense ministers, arguing again that European nations have relied too heavily on U.S. security guarantees while focusing instead, he said, on issues such as climate change.
Hegseth also echoed complaints from the Trump administration and its supporters that European nations had strayed too far from their largely Christian pasts by embracing diversity initiatives and non-European refugees
“For too long, NATO has been a paper tiger and a one-way street. No more,” Hegseth told the room of defense ministers.
“Instead of tanks and fighters and air defenses, the focus has been on gender equity and climate change and defense austerity,” he said. “Europe’s borders flew wide open, welfare states expanded, defense budgets cratered, along with Europe’s belief in itself and its civilization.”
Hegseth lamented an era of “demilitarization.” He repeated Trump’s rebuke of European leaders who hesitated to endorse the war that the U.S. and Israel unleashed against Iran, which has roiled the Middle East and upended the global economy.
“We’ve been so clear and so candid to restore NATO’s core military role and character,” Hegseth said.
Such rhetoric from Trump or his emissaries is hardly new. And European leaders do not deny that their nations sought to benefit from the “peace dividend” that followed the end of the Cold War, allowing their budgets to focus more on health care and education.
Trump and many of his predecessors in the White House have long pressed NATO allies to step up their national military spending, and Trump can claim notable success in winning commitments to do so.
“Some of our allies have gotten the message and stepped up. You know who you are, and we very much appreciate it,” Hegseth said, without naming anyone.
But he said others did not, berating European countries that lag on defense spending and those that refused the U.S. access to their bases for attacks on Iran — a war of Trump’s choice that falls outside NATO’s Euro-Atlantic remit. “It was shameful,” Hegseth said.
Now, Hegseth added, the Pentagon will “examine America’s force posture and basing in Europe,” saying it would take up to six months. He said it would consider the input of the U.S. Army’s European command and also consult with Congress and NATO allies.
“But make no mistake about it,” Hegseth cautioned. “This will be a real review. It will be designed to ensure that NATO is moving fast and irreversibly toward Europe leading.”
He said the administration wants to encourage allies to do more, “so we’re going to keep a close eye on allies who are not doing that and who say no or maybe.” He warned that some nations would “fail” the review, without elaborating.
European capitals have expected a U.S. military drawdown, but they have lobbied for more clarity about Washington’s plans. Trump has issued confusing social media posts in recent months about planned troop withdrawals from Germany and deployments to Poland.
In the past, Trump announced reductions but didn’t follow through. While the president has long voiced skepticism of NATO, his administration is now taking some of its first substantial steps toward diminishing the U.S. footprint in Europe and within the alliance.
Trump’s rebukes of NATO, along with his threats to leave the alliance and his on-and-off bid to take Greenland from NATO ally Denmark, sparked a crisis in the alliance not seen in generations.
European leaders have tried to accommodate Trump, seeking to preserve those guarantees as they embark on the arduous and costly mission of building up their defenses. The alliance also continues to serve as a platform for U.S. military interests.
Several European nations such as Germany and Britain have lent their bases and airspace to the Iran war effort, even as politicians sought to distance themselves from the conflict and the U.S. president, both unpopular on the continent. Some countries, namely Spain, strongly opposed the war, drawing Trump’s ire.
Even with a more dramatic U.S. pullback, some European officials have argued that they would be better off strengthening their defenses through NATO and taking the reins of its existing structure rather than starting over.
German Defense Minister Boris Pistorius told reporters early Thursday that he did not yet know the U.S. plans. Pistorius called for a “road map” for any military drawdown and conceded some assets would be tough to replace quickly, such as deep precision-strike capabilities.
Belgian Defense Minister Theo Francken, said there would be “heavy discussions on who’s doing what” to fill gaps left by the U.S. in the NATO Force Model, a pool of assets allies agree to mobilize in wartime.
“We will absolutely replace U.S. platforms … they’re withdrawing a lot of their capabilities,” Francken said, adding that Belgium would provide fighter jets, reconnaissance drones and naval assets.
The post U.S. moves toward troop reductions in Europe as Hegseth scolds NATO allies appeared first on Washington Post.
