Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas took issue with the Supreme Court‘s opinion issued on Friday in regards to the Trump administration’s use of the Alien Enemies Act (AEA), saying the court has no authority to issue the kind of relief his colleagues approved.
Alito accused his fellow justices of “a mischaracterization” of events leading up to the request for injunctive relief and offered a reinterpretation of those events. He stressed that in his view, “the Federal Rules do not permit such a shortcut” in regards to how the court certified a class of plaintiffs to resist the AEA use.
Newsweek reached out to the White House for comment via email on Friday afternoon.
Why It Matters
President Donald Trump has made mass deportations a centerpiece policy of his second administration. He promised to enact those deportations upon taking office, and had much public backing to do so, according to polling at the time.
However, he has faced legal gridlock on various aspects of his efforts, including his use of the 1798 AEA. Trump used the act to target alleged members of Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua, which his administration has designated as a terrorist organization.
What To Know
The Supreme Court in April issued an 11th-hour injunction blocking the administration’s use of the AEA on certain persons in order to better consider the case. The court on Friday then issued a full opinion on the matter, in which the justices argued that the administration must provide greater notice than 24 hours that it intends to deport someone under the act.
Alito dissented from the per curiam opinion (meaning the opinion was issued from the court as a whole rather than a particular justice as the author), with only Thomas joining him in dissent.
Part of Alito’s dissent took issue with the class of Venezuelan migrants at question, accusing his fellow justices of preferring to “ignore the important step of class certification and skip directly to the adjudication of the class members’ rights.”
“The Federal Rules do not permit such a shortcut,” Alito wrote, separately noting in his dissent that the case of the two individuals—identified as A.A.R.P. or W.M.M.—have key differences from the putative class at the heart of the case, and continued to take issue with how the court has treated class certification and qualification.
“Instead of merely ruling on the application that is before us—which asks for emergency relief pending appeal—the Court takes the unusual step of granting certiorari before judgment, summarily vacating the judgment below dismissing the applicants’ appeal, and remanding the case to the Court of Appeals with directions regarding the issues that court should address,” Alito wrote.
“From the Court’s order, it is not entirely clear whether the Court has silently decided issues that go beyond the question of interim relief,” he wrote, adding, “(I certainly hope that it has not.) But if it has done so, today’s order is doubly extraordinary.”
He concluded: “If the Court has gone beyond that question, it has blazed a new
trail. It has plucked a case from a district court and decided important issues in the first instance. To my eyes, that looks far too much like an expansion of our original jurisdiction,” saying that he “must therefore respectfully dissent.”
What People Are Saying
Trump wrote on Truth Social: “The Supreme Court has just ruled that the worst murderers, drug dealers, gang members, and even those who are mentally insane, who came into our Country illegally, are not allowed to be forced out without going through a long, protracted, and expensive Legal Process, one that will take, possibly, many years for each person, and one that will allow these people to commit many crimes before they even see the inside of a Courthouse. The result of this decision will let more CRIMINALS pour into our Country, doing great harm to our cherished American public. It will also encourage other criminals to illegally enter our Country, wreaking havoc and bedlam wherever they go. The Supreme Court of the United States is not allowing me to do what I was elected to do. Sleepy Joe Biden allowed MILLIONS of Criminal Aliens to come into our Country without any “PROCESS” but, in order to get them out of our Country, we have to go through a long and extended PROCESS. In any event, thank you to Justice Alito and Justice Thomas for attempting to protect our Country. This is a bad and dangerous day for America!”
What Happens Next
The Supreme Court sent the case back to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals to consider appropriate procedures on how to properly alert potential deportees of their impending removal.
The post Justice Samuel Alito Accuses Supreme Court of Taking ‘Shortcut’ appeared first on Newsweek.
