A federal judge in Pennsylvania ruled on Tuesday that President Donald Trump can use the Alien Enemies Act (AEA) to expedite the removal of suspected gang members, in a boost for the administration’s mass deportation plans.
Why It Matters
In March 2025, Trump invoked the AEA to authorize the expedited deportation of Venezuelan nationals, suspected of being affiliated with the notorious Tren de Aragua gang. The administration labeled the group a Foreign Terrorist Organization, alleging it engaged in criminal activities such as human trafficking and drug smuggling, and posed a national security threat.
The ruling could have profound implications for immigration policy and executive authority, especially as civil liberties groups have raised concerns about its potential for abuse and erosion of due process.
What To Know
U.S. District Judge Stephanie Haines ruled in favor of the Trump administration’s use of the AEA to deport Venezuelan nationals suspected of being members of criminal gangs.
Haines, a Trump appointee, said that she determined the White House proclamation “complies with AEA.” However, she also noted that the administration “must provide greater notice to those subject to removal under the AEA than they are currently providing.”
While allowing the expedited deportation process to continue, the judge mandated that individuals must be given at least 21 days’ notice to contest their removal. This requirement represents a significant shift from the previous practice, where individuals were only given 12 to 24 hours’ notice.
Haines concluded that the evidence presented by the Trump administration supported the president’s reasoning behind the proclamation. She referenced the official designation of the Tren de Aragua gang as a foreign terrorist organization by Secretary of State Marco Rubio.
The ruling from Haines diverges from decisions made by federal judges in Colorado, New York, and South Texas. They ruled that it was unlawful for Trump to invoke the act to deport suspected gang members outside of the typical immigration court process.
As a result, all three issued orders blocking or temporarily halting such deportations in their respective districts. Just hours after Haines’s ruling on Tuesday, a judge in West Texas also issued a temporary block on deportations under the AEA.
Haines’s decision could pave the way for deportations under the legislation in her western Pennsylvania court district, which includes the Moshannon Valley Processing Center, the largest immigration detention facility in the Northeast.
However, migrants targeted for deportation would still have the opportunity to challenge their removals, potentially bringing their cases before different judges.
The Trump administration has not announced any new AEA deportations since mid-March, when the swift removal of over 130 Venezuelans to an El Salvador prison sparked legal challenges.
Immigrant advocates have called on the Supreme Court to clarify how much notice migrants should receive before removal under the act and to review the legality of Trump’s use of the law. The administration has requested the court lift its block on deportations in North Texas, claiming adequate notice has been provided.
Before Trump’s presidency, the AEA had been used only three times, always during wartime.
What People Are Saying
Lee Gelernt, an attorney for the American Civil Liberties Union, told ABC News: “The court properly rejected the government’s argument that they can remove people with only 12 hours’ notice. But we disagree with the court’s ruling that the Alien Enemies Act can be used during peacetime.”
U.S. District Judge Stephanie Haines wrote: “The court cannot help but ask: Is a Foreign Terrorist Organization like [Tren de Aragua] not the modern equivalent of a pirate or robber?”
What Happens Next
Deportations under the AEA may proceed in Pennsylvania, but remain blocked elsewhere.
The post Donald Trump Scores Major Legal Win Over Mass Deportations appeared first on Newsweek.
