DNYUZ
No Result
View All Result
DNYUZ
No Result
View All Result
DNYUZ
Home News

‘This is a criminal act’: DOJ’s $1.776 billion ‘slush fund’ protested as ‘blatant theft’

May 18, 2026
in News
‘This is a criminal act’: DOJ’s $1.776 billion ‘slush fund’ protested as ‘blatant theft’

The Department of Justice announced the creation of a $1.776 billion fund of taxpayer money that would be used to pay off President Donald Trump’s allies, including Jan. 6 rioters, who say they were politically targeted by previous administrations.

The 79-year-old president, his two elder sons Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump, and the family-owned Trump Organization agreed to drop their $10 billion lawsuit against the Internal Revenue Service in exchange for the establishment of the taxpayer-funded payouts, which will have little oversight or transparency.

The president and his sons say the IRS and the Treasury Department failed to stop a former employee from leaking their tax returns, but a judge overseeing the case gave the administration until Wednesday to explain “whether a case or controversy exists” after questioning why the court should weigh since Trump controls the Justice Department.

Trump’s personal lawyers argued Monday in a filing the court did not need to weigh in because they were voluntarily agreeing to dismiss the case, and the administration never replied to the suit.

The terms of the settlement sparked outrage across social media.

“Democrats should be saying anybody who takes this stolen money will see the government coming after them to claw it back,” demanded election law expert Andy Craig.

“As Jamie Raskin also tells me here, if Dems take back one or both chambers of Congress, they will shut down the slush fund, and use oversight power to compel release of a list of any/all payments made between now and 2027,” reported The New Republic’s Greg Sargent. “So Trump can’t necessarily hide these payments forever.”

“The largest federal reparations fund in US history goes not to indigenous tribes or descendants of formerly enslaved people or interned Japanese-Americans — but to J6ers who smeared s— on the walls of the US Capitol and attempted to hang the Vice President,” seethed meteorologist and climate journalist Eric Holthaus.

“So you CAN get reparations you just have to be a reactionary white person who tries to overthrow the government because black votes shouldn’t count,” noted writer Adam Serwer.

“I’ll be interested (and horrified) to see how much actually goes to violent J6ers as opposed to those who are already rich, powerful, and aggrieved, with ‘lawfare’ defined as friends of Trump prosecuted for tax fraud and domestic violence,” pondered writer Jeff Sharlet.

“A lot of people are talking about the $1.8 billion slush fund as though it’s going to Jan 6ers. Is this established somewhere? I would imagine it’s more likely to go to Trump’s family and allies who claim that criminal probes/sentences were political,” agreed journalist Philip Bump.

“This is THEFT. There is no other word for it,” denounced Aaron Reichlin-Melnick. “They are stealing almost $1.8 BILLION dollars to pay Trump‘s allies, despite knowing that these people are not legally entitled to any money and be laughed out of court if they filed a lawsuit for money damages. It is my personal opinion that this is a criminal act and people should respond accordingly.”

“Can the law firms and universities targeted by the current administration apply for these funds?” wondered pollster Kevin Collins.

“The corruption and incompetence knows no bounds,” marveled Bluesky user Hari Seldon. “If there had not been push-back, this would have ended in a self-payoff, aka: blatant theft.”

“$1.7 billion is about to be paid out of the pockets of US taxpayers to J6 criminals who beat cops and Trump’s other dirty henchmen,” decried MeidasNews editor in chief Ron Filipkowski. “Trump set up a slush fund to reward these scumbags with your money and Republicans in Congress won’t say a word about this disgusting corruption.”

The post ‘This is a criminal act’: DOJ’s $1.776 billion ‘slush fund’ protested as ‘blatant theft’ appeared first on Raw Story.

After 40 years, the Afghan Whigs still sound like no one else — and they’re not done yet
News

After 40 years, the Afghan Whigs still sound like no one else — and they’re not done yet

by Los Angeles Times
May 18, 2026

For fans of the Afghan Whigs, the first half of 2026 has been a glorious time. The beloved Cincinnati-born band ...

Read more
News

Drake Accused of Ripping Off a Beat From Another Rapper for His New Album: ‘You Got Me F***ed Up’

May 18, 2026
News

Elon Musk loses lawsuit against Sam Altman and OpenAI after jury rules he waited too long to sue

May 18, 2026
News

Ebola Raged for Weeks in Congo Before Anyone Raised the Alarm

May 18, 2026
News

Congo to open three Ebola treatment centers as virus outbreak kills 105

May 18, 2026
AI is eating the market and Wall Street strategists have bubble brain as they debate: are we in 1997 or 1999?

AI is eating the market and Wall Street strategists have bubble brain as they debate: are we in 1997 or 1999?

May 18, 2026
Inside the AI compute crunch driving Google researchers to quit

Inside the AI compute crunch driving Google researchers to quit

May 18, 2026
Dropout CEO Sam Reich on ‘Game Changer’ and How His Labor Secretary Dad Taught Him to Empower Artists

Dropout CEO Sam Reich on ‘Game Changer’ and How His Labor Secretary Dad Taught Him to Empower Artists

May 18, 2026

DNYUZ © 2026

No Result
View All Result

DNYUZ © 2026