There may be no faster way to whip the British political scene into a frenzy these days than to wade into the fraught debates over free expression, the power of the police and Israel’s treatment of Palestinians.
Sarah Helm should know better than most. Her husband, Jonathan Powell, is Britain’s top national security adviser.
And yet, last Friday, Ms. Helm, a former journalist-turned-author, posted on X about her support for Palestine Action, an activist group that is at the center of a free-speech legal battle triggered when the Labour government banned it as a terrorist organization.
“God help us authors who support Palestine and Palestine Action,” she wrote on the social media platform. She was referencing a decision by the Irish novelist Sally Rooney and her publisher, Faber, to stop selling Ms. Rooney’s books in the U.K. because Ms. Rooney had pledged to donate royalties to Palestine Action, which could violate British law.
In an interview, Ms. Helm said she did not expect her post to spark headlines.
“Absurd. Frankly totally absurd,” she said.
In fact, Ms. Helm’s decision to come to the defense of Ms. Rooney generated questions from critics about her husband, who has a central role in Britain’s Middle East diplomacy, as well as debate about whether the partners of senior officials should avoid expressing views in public forums. It sparked calls for his resignation, including from a Conservative Party lawmaker who said his position was “untenable.”
It also plunged Ms. Helm into a searing argument inside Britain about how much the government should police what people say, especially online.
“I didn’t think at all that anything like this would happen,” she said.
Right wing politicians in Britain, supported by President Trump and Vice President JD Vance, have previously accused the authorities of trying to muzzle conservative views. Activists on the left, including those who protest Israel’s treatment of Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank, say laws designed to ban terrorist groups have been weaponized against them.
Last year, the Labour government of Keir Starmer banned Palestine Action as a terrorist organization, the first time that Britain had used such powers against a group for damaging property, rather than for violence against people. The group had repeatedly damaged facilities linked to an Israeli weapons manufacturer, painted “Gaza is not 4 sale” on the Trump Turnberry golf resort and broke into an R.A.F. base where they damaged two aircraft.
Under British law, anyone expressing support for the group can be arrested and charged.
Ms. Helm’s post quickly got people talking inside the political establishment, with some asking whether it would put her in legal jeopardy and what — if anything — it meant for her husband, one of Prime Minister Andy Burnham’s most senior advisers.
“Wife of national security adviser ‘a hardened anti-Israel activist,’” said the Times of London. The Sun wrote: “‘INDEFENSIBLE’ U.K.’s national security adviser faces calls to be sacked.” On the other side of the debate, a columnist for The Observer bemoaned a “wonderful outbreak of Stepford wifery,” condemning those calling for Mr. Powell’s resignation for the assumption that “her husband should have kept her in check.”
The Metropolitan Police quickly dismissed the possibility that Ms. Helm might suffer the fate of thousands of peaceful activists who have been charged for holding signs demonstrating their support for Palestine Action. “The post was assessed by specialist officers and it was determined that it did not meet the criminal threshold,” they said.
If political insiders thought that might be the end of an awkward moment for Mr. Powell, Ms. Helm had other ideas.
Over the weekend, she continued writing on X. In dozens of posts, she defended herself, argued with critics and continued to express her opposition to the banning of Palestine Action.
“Where do I sign the letter calling for such absurdity to halt and for Palestine Action to be unbanned under the Terrorism act?” she wrote in one post. Responding to a journalist for The Spectator magazine who accused her of “defending Hamas” in previous posts, she wrote that his article was “cut and paste distortion.”
When one person asked whether it was true that “your husband is blocking illegal settlements sanctions,” Ms. Helm wrote simply “No.” When another asked whether Mr. Powell is “an antisemite,” Ms. Helm asked back: “Are you?”
Mr. Powell, a diplomat who has been at the center of Britain’s attempts to shore up support for Ukraine and to maintain ties with the Trump administration, did not respond to requests for comment on his wife’s post or the calls for his resignation.
Ms. Helm declined to talk about her husband, but said she does not regret speaking up on behalf of Palestinians and people who peacefully protest to call attention to their plight.
“Prosecute those who cause criminal damage under the criminal law, but not under the terrorism act,” she said of Palestine Action activists who committed acts of vandalism.
She added: “Silencing, smothering the voices of those who support their cause is extremely chilling. It is Orwellian and it is Kafkaesque. It is frightening.”
In 2015 Ms. Helm published “Ravensbrück: Life and Death in Hitler’s Concentration Camp for Women,” which a New York Times reviewer said gave “an agonizing sense of the dark heart of the Nazi ethos.” For several years she has been working on a book about Gaza and the plight of the Palestinians.
To those who know her, it might have come as little surprise that Ms. Helm did not back down in the face of criticism or out of concern for her husband’s career.
She has long been forthright about her views and even wrote a play, “Loyalty,” that echoed elements of her life and marriage to Mr. Powell, that opened at the Hampstead Theatre in London in 2011. It was a fictionalized telling of the years when Mr. Powell was chief of staff to Prime Minister Tony Blair during the run-up to the Iraq War.
“She was bitterly opposed to the second Iraq war,” but kept that view private, The Telegraph noted in a review of the play. “Eight years on, she has broken her silence.”
In an interview for that article, Ms. Helm said: “I’m ready for the fact that I might be attacked for the very thing I’m writing about, which is disloyalty. I will be accused of being a bitter, disloyal, anti-war harridan who wanted to finally have her say. I will be accused of betraying my own husband and the Prime Minister.”
In fact, she said that Mr. Powell was supportive of her decision to write the play (by that time, many of the main players involved, including Mr. Blair and Mr. Powell, had published their own memoirs covering the decision to go to war.)
Mr. Burnham’s office this week said of Ms. Helm’s posts: “These views are held by an individual who does not represent the government in any capacity.”
Ms. Helm said that she had decided to stop engaging on X for now. She said she was intrigued — but not entirely surprised — by the ferocity of the debate that her post sparked online, pitting pro-Israel and pro-Palestinian voices against each other.
“The two sides of the argument are now so far apart,” she said. “They have such different versions of history. They don’t overlap at any point.”
The post How a U.K. Official’s Wife Set Off a Debate Over Free Speech and Palestinians appeared first on New York Times.
