John Iliffe, a historian of Africa whose intensively researched work focused on the struggles of ordinary citizens, influencing generations of scholars and students, died on Aug. 20 in Cambridge, England. He was 87.
His death, in a nursing home, was announced by St. Johns College at the University of Cambridge, where he taught for 55 years.
For decades, Mr. Iliffe put in long hours in sweltering African archives for books that covered wars, nation-building, demography, disease, leaders and the poor. Fellow historians of the continent revered him because he placed the African at the center of his books. Not the king, the dictator or the guerrilla chief, but the African citizen, existing in the world’s most hostile physical environment and fighting to preserve his or her dignity.
Africans merited gratitude from the rest of us for that alone, Mr. Iliffe believed. They were “the frontiersmen who have colonised an especially hostile region of the world on behalf of the entire human race,” he wrote in his “Africans: The History of a Continent,” (revised edition 2017).
“That has been their chief contribution to history,” Mr. Iliffe wrote in the book, still considered the standard text on African history, 30 years after it was first published.
“It is why they deserve admiration, support and careful study,” he continued.
Mr. Iliffe spent his life’s work engaged in all three.
In six major books — and especially in “The African Poor: A History” (1987) and “Honour in African History” (2005) — he cataloged the ways in which “suffering has been a central part of the African experience, whether it arose from the harsh struggle with nature or the cruelty of men,” as he wrote in “Africans.”
In “Honour,” he chronicled Africans’ endurance in the face of adversity, especially its latter-day manifestation, the tyrannical regime.
The code of African honor was many-sided, in Mr. Iliffe’s view. It helped the ordinary citizen endure brutality but it also encouraged the dictator in vainglorious excess.
In Guinea’s ghastly Boiro prison under the dictator Ahmed Sékou Touré, “prisoners measured courage by the number of torture sessions endured.” In Idi Amin’s Uganda, students “marched through the capital” to protest a shooting, at huge risk. Peasants from Ouelessebougou in Mali in 1968 flooded the capital’s jail to free their neighbors, braving the then-regime’s forces.
The flip side of this everyday heroism was what Mr. Iliffe called “the heroic style of leadership,” a “major obstacle to democracy,” he wrote, citing Ghana’s Kwame Nkrumah and Togo’s Gnassingbe Eyadema, who was “the hero himself, depicted in statues in all the important town,” a dictator who “required even his ministers to display abject servility.”
Mr. Iliffe was an old-fashioned scholar, colleagues said, interested in people and facts, not theory, and in filling hundreds of shoe boxes with index cards. Working in the state archives in Malawi, he wouldn’t leave them to applaud the head of state’s passing motorcade, as other researchers were told to do, “because he refused to sacrifice even a minute of precious time in the archive,” a colleague, Megan Vaughan, recalled.
“He had a tremendous capacity to find his way through complex subjects and bring out the humanity of the African actors,” Derek Peterson, a historian of Africa at the University of Michigan, said in an interview. “He took on a whole range of subjects and he always put Africans at the center of the story, even when they failed.”
African demography — the waning and waxing of African population growth — was the “connecting thread, as a way of ordering the material” in his research, the German scholar Andreas Eckert said in an interview.
Underpopulation — the sparsity of population centers across Africa’s vast expanses — explained the continent’s relative lack of development in the centuries leading up to 19th-century colonization. Slavery was not a primary culprit, he wrote in “Africans,” contrary to others’ interpretations. “In the economic field as probably in the demographic, the slave trade chiefly intensified relative backwardness,” he wrote, referring to Africa’s lag in technology and urbanization, among other areas.
Then, with advances in modern medicine cutting into mortality rates, Africa experienced “demographic growth of a scale and speed unique in human history,” he wrote in “Africans.” “This growth underlay the collapse of colonial rule, the destruction of apartheid, and the instability of successor regimes.”
John Iliffe was born in Luton, England, on May 1, 1939, the younger of two sons of Arthur Iliffe, a bank manager, and Violet (Evelyn) Iliffe. He was educated at Framlingham College, a boarding school in Suffolk.
He received his undergraduate and Ph.D. degrees from Peterhouse College, Cambridge, in 1961 and 1965, with a thesis on colonial German East Africa. He set off to teach at the University College of Dar es Salaam in newly independent Tanzania, becoming part of what was later celebrated as the “Dar es Salaam School of African History,” a group of academics, caught up in idealistic nation-building, who worked to produce an anticolonial narrative of the recent African past.
He returned to Cambridge in 1971, becoming a fellow at St. Johns College, and remained there for the next 55 years, producing his first major book, “A Modern History of Tanganyika,” still considered a model national history by African historians, in 1979.
Mr. Iliffe leaves no immediate survivors.
He wasn’t a sentimentalist about Africa and had no romantic notions about the continent, colleagues said, but nor was he what scholars and others call an Afropessimist. Mostly, he admired ordinary Africans, “the commoners, not the kings,” Mr. Peterson said.
“African history owes John a staggering debt in his sheer curiosity, his extraordinary appetite for grueling hard work, his courage in publishing in so many areas of others’ expertise,” his Cambridge colleague John Lonsdale said after his death.
Kieran Corcoran contributed research.
The post How a Painstaking Scholar Reinterpreted African History appeared first on New York Times.
