DNYUZ
No Result
View All Result
DNYUZ
No Result
View All Result
DNYUZ
Home News

‘The ability to say no’: artists demand consent over AI use of their music

June 23, 2026
in News
‘The ability to say no’: artists demand consent over AI use of their music

A coalition of advocacy groups for artists, songwriters and managers is warning musicians about the growing risks of artificial intelligence music.

Recently, many major record labels have inked deals with AImusic startups such as Suno, Udio and Klay. But the coalition, which includes organizations such as the Music Artists Coalition and the Songwriters of North America, argues in a new letter that “artists and songwriters whose works, voices, performances, likenesses and creative identities make those deals valuable are not being meaningfully consulted.”

The letter, released Monday, stated that many artists and songwriters in existing recording and publishing agreements are currently receiving letters from their labels and publishers claiming that they “will be opted in to AI-related uses by default, with little actual choice offered.” Even new artists are receiving agreements that include “AI rights clauses as a standard condition of signing.”

“We support innovation and recognise that AI can create new opportunities for music,” the coalition wrote in the letter. “However artists are not simply catalogue assets, and innovation cannot be used to override artists’ rights.”

The National Independent Talent Organization, a live entertainment advocacy group that signed the letter, said many of its members are coming to the organization with label contracts that include “non-negotiable AI usage clauses.”

“We can’t allow for contract language signed decades before this technology existed to be the standard bearer. These rights belong to the creators and they get the final say on usage,” said Nathaniel Marro, NITO’s executive director, in a statement to The Times.

“Music companies are leading the fight to protect artists’ and songwriters’ rights in the age of AI,” said a spokesperson for IFPI, the recording industry’s global trade body.

“While our members have taken different approaches, they share the same fundamental objectives: combating the unauthorized use of music and establishing licensing models that return revenue to artists and songwriters,” the IFPI spokesperson added.

The coalition is asking the industry to move forward on AI deals only under four conditions: that musicians directly consent to any agreement; that artists receive fair compensation; that there be transparency between the companies and the talent; and that companies make a public commitment to end contracts built on default AI opt-ins and forced AI clauses.

“Artists need a real seat in these conversations, clear terms on revenue share, and the ability to say no without losing their deal,” said Ron Gubitz, the Music Artists Coalition’s executive director, in a statement.

This letter comes at a time when policymakers are reviewing copyright rules in response to AI and when streaming platforms and social media platforms are overflowing with AI-generated music.

A little over two weeks ago, the American Federation of Musicians sued Universal Music Group and Warner Music Group. The complaint claims the major labels “received significant compensation” from the AI companies for past copyright violations and licensed “substantial” portions of their music catalogs to them, but haven’t shared that with the musicians.

Despite the confrontational tone of the letter, some signatories struck a more conciliatory note. Overall, the industry seems to be receptive to these AI changes, said Willie “Prophet” Stiggers of the Black Music Action Coalition, another signatory advocacy group. At this point in AI’s development, he added, everyone in the industry — from artists and labels to AI start-ups and policymakers — has a responsibility to establish effective guardrails.

“The companies building these technologies understand that trust is essential to long-term success, and trust begins with respecting creators’ rights,” Stiggers said in a statement to The Times. “There’s still important work ahead, but we’re encouraged that the conversation has shifted from whether protections are needed to how we build them together.”

“The structures being created now will shape the music ecosystem for years to come,” the coalition’s letter said. “The future of music must be built with artists, songwriters and their representatives, not imposed on them.”

Times staff writer Wendy Lee contributed to this report.

The post ‘The ability to say no’: artists demand consent over AI use of their music appeared first on Los Angeles Times.

U.S. Presses Meta to Agree to A.I. Reviews as Security Concerns Rise
News

U.S. Presses Meta to Agree to A.I. Reviews as Security Concerns Rise

by New York Times
June 23, 2026

The Trump administration is pressing Meta to submit its artificial intelligence models for voluntary review, which would allow the government ...

Read more
News

After the Knicks and World Cup, New York is ready for another challenge: the Olympics

June 23, 2026
News

RFK Jr. has not abandoned his anti-vaccine agenda

June 23, 2026
News

This is why the Madonna biopic starring Julia Garner isn’t happening after all

June 23, 2026
News

Trump just ‘blurted out’ a ‘five-alarm scandal’ about California meddling: critics

June 23, 2026
Colleges are accepting transfer credits from online platforms that aren’t schools

They aren’t colleges. But they promise fast, cheap college credits.

June 23, 2026
Jill Smokler, Who Blogged as Scary Mommy, Dies at 48

Jill Smokler, Who Blogged as Scary Mommy, Dies at 48

June 23, 2026
Landmark housing bill advances in Congress with bipartisan support

Landmark housing bill advances in Congress with bipartisan support

June 23, 2026

DNYUZ © 2026

No Result
View All Result

DNYUZ © 2026