A rift has opened at the top of Germany’s government over Syria. After , Foreign Minister declared that Syrian refugees cannot safely return home. “Hardly anyone can live here with dignity,” he said.
On Monday, Chancellor countered: “The civil war in Syria is over. There is no longer any reason for asylum in Germany, and therefore we can begin repatriations” — a pointed remark delivered in Wadephul’s own hometown of Husum on Germany’s North Sea coast.
The Chancellor’s remarks landed like a public reprimand of his party colleague, even as Merz sought to play it down. He pointed out that Wadephul had toured an especially devastated area of Damascus — suggesting that the Foreign Minister’s judgement may have been clouded by emotion.
It took several days for the Foreign Minister to clarify his position: he still backs the deportation of Syrian criminals and supports voluntary returns. But by then, the political fallout had already taken hold.
In a parliamentary group meeting, Wadephul reportedly remarked that Syria looked worse than postwar Germany. According to attendees, the comment further isolated him within the center-right (CDU).
The AfD factor
By that point, Wadephul was already facing mounting criticism from within the conservative ranks. Among the first to speak out was Interior Minister of the (CSU), the CDU’s Bavarian sister party, which traditionally takes a more hardline stance on migration. Dobrindt saw no compelling reason to oppose returns to Syria.
State leaders of the CDU in Saxony-Anhalt and Baden-Württemberg quickly echoed the call for swift repatriations of Syrian refugees. The timing was telling: both states face elections next year, and the CDU is feeling the heat from the far-right , which is climbing in the polls with its uncompromising stance on migration — and currently leads in Saxony-Anhalt. Wadephul’s moral reservations found little sympathy among CDU politicians in these regions. Almost on cue, AfD leader accused the CDU of “refusing to deport.”
Henning Hoff of the German Council on Foreign Relations wrote to DW: “There is great unease within the CDU in light of current polling. Key parts of the party believe the momentum can be reversed with ‘greater toughness’ in migration policy, and they are determined not to show weakness.”
At the same time, he warned that it is not only “inhumane” but also “unrealistic” to believe that “Around one million Syrian refugees, many of them well integrated, could simply be ‘sent home.’ The conditions in Syria do not allow for that.”
Legally, only a small fraction of Syrians in Germany are currently eligible for deportation. According to the Federal Ministry of the Interior, 920 Syrians in Germany are currently required to leave the country and do not have temporary residence permits, while another 9,780 are required to leave but have temporary residence permits because there have been no deportations to Syria in the past twelve years. There are currently around 950,000 Syrian immigrants living in Germany, the vast majority came as refugees during the civil war there ten years ago and have humanitarian protection status. Many are well-integrated and even have German citizenship.
Wadephul comments on Israel, Bundeswehr and ruffles feathers in China
Syria isn’t the only issue where Johann Wadephul has faced pushback from within his own party.
In August, he warned that deploying German troops to Ukraine would “overburden” the Bundeswehr — a remark that risked undercutting Chancellor Merz’s negotiating position just as he prepared for high-level talks in Washington with US President .
Wadephul also drew criticism for objecting to what he described as Germany’s “forced solidarity” with Israel, just as Chancellor Merz was publicly defending Israel against genocide accusations. Josef Schuster, president of the Central Council of Jews in Germany, called the phrase “very problematic and unfortunate” in an interview with the German daily Die Welt.
Henning Hoff observed: “The Foreign Minister repeatedly speaks too spontaneously and without due consideration — even on topics that are not his responsibility, such as Germany’s role in the ‘Coalition of the Willing,’ where he expressed concern about overstretching the . Less would be more.”
Wadephul also caused , one of Germany’s most important trading partners, by abruptly canceling a planned visit to Beijing. The decision came after it became clear that no meetings had been scheduled for him beyond one with his counterpart Wang Yi. The move reportedly offended the Chinese government.
Familiar fault lines: Baerbock and Scholz
The opposition has been quick to capitalize on the CDU’s internal divisions. “Even in foreign policy, the Chancellor and the CDU must now ask themselves why they even have a Foreign Minister,” quipped parliamentary leader Katharina Dröge. “Every time the Foreign Minister speaks, his own party members question him.”
The coalition government between the center-right CDU/CSU and the center-left (SPD) had vowed to outperform its unpopular predecessor, the three-way coalition led by SPD Chancellor which toppled one year ago.
Merz, in particular, had pledged to put an end to infighting — especially on foreign policy. Under Scholz, tensions with former Green Party Foreign Minister were frequent, as she occasionally appeared to chart her own course in foreign affairs, independent of the Chancellery.
Now, the same problem appears to be resurfacing — this time within the CDU itself. “The promised ‘coherent foreign policy’ is not materializing,” said Henning Hoff. “That’s partly due to Wadephul’s rhetoric, which has made him unpopular within his own party, but also to the Chancellery’s lack of coordination and — at least in this case — its delayed response.”
This article was originally written in German.
While you’re here: Every Tuesday, DW editors round up what is happening in German politics and society. You can sign up here for the weekly email newsletter, Berlin Briefing.
The post Pressure builds on German Foreign Minister Wadephul appeared first on Deutsche Welle.
