has been accused of inadvertently drawing nations — a loose grouping of some of the world’s fastest-growing emerging economies — closer together by imposing higher on them than on other countries.
, the largest member, still faces the prospect of a 145% tariff if it can’t cut a deal with Trump, while and have been slapped with a 50% rate — half of India’s penalty is for buying discounted Russian oil. was , and even newer members like Egypt could see their tariffs go up, due to their participation in BRICS.
Trump has repeatedly warned during the first seven months of his second term of against any nation aligning with what he calls “anti-American policies” — a pointed reference to the BRICS’ growing challenge to US global dominance.
Trump gave BRICS a ‘shared incentive’
Former Indian trade official Ajay Srivastava thinks BRICS nations feel “little intimidation” from being singled out for additional penalties by Trump. He told DW that the tariffs “give BRICS a shared incentive to cut their reliance on the US, even if agendas differ.”
Those additional tariffs have created a common grievance among BRICS members, who are now expanding bilateral trade agreements in national currencies to reduce dependence on the US dollar. BRICS central banks have also ramped up gold purchases, another signal of their desire to dedollarize.
While Trump has declared “BRICS is dead,” one critic has accused the US president of “strategic malpractice,” arguing that the Republican has turned a loose coalition of countries with vastly different objectives into a .
In a recent op-ed for The Washington Post, Max Boot, a foreign policy analyst at the Council on Foreign Relations think tank, said Trump was “diminishing US power by perversely uniting America’s friends with our enemies” — a reference to how Brazil, South Africa and India are aligning more closely with China and .
Xi, Modi, Putin to meet in China
A further display of the growing solidarity among BRICS members will be on show at the Shanghai Cooperation Organization summit in Tianjin, northern China, starting Sunday. Chinese President will host his Indian and Russian counterparts, and , along with leaders from around 20 other countries from the . This will be Modi’s first time on Chinese soil in seven years.
Ahead of the summit, the Kremlin has been pushing for China, Russia and India to hold their first trilateral talks in six years, a move that aims to of the BRICS alliance.
Moscow believes that reviving high-level dialogue among the three largest BRICS members could help quell long-standing tensions, especially between India and China, and present a more cohesive counterbalance to the West.
India recalibrates approach to China
Trump’s huge tariffs have pushed New Delhi to with China, resuming direct flights, easing visa restrictions and increasing trade discussions. The two countries have also held talks to resolve long-standing disputes along their almost 3,500-kilometer (2,175-mile) de facto border.
During a visit to India last week by Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi, Beijing agreed to boost supplies of to the South Asian country. China controls over 85% of global rare earth processing, while India urgently needs these minerals for clean energy, electric vehicles and defense technologies.
Despite backing each other to host the 2026 and 2027 BRICS summits, there are several reasons to doubt a significant improvement in Sino-Indian ties, given New Delhi’s suspicions over China’s ambitions in Asia.
Shilan Shah, deputy chief emerging markets economist at the London-based Capital Economics, cited China’s close relations with India’s main foe Pakistan and the , which has caused unease in New Delhi. In addition, Shah wrote in a research note that “an influx of cheap Chinese imports” was “undermining India’s efforts to strengthen [its] domestic industry.”
India’s mistrust of China and its longstanding ties with Washington could hurt ambitions to move the BRICS project forward. India still relies heavily on the US market and technology, with exports to the US totaling $77.5 billion (€66.46 billion) in 2024, versus much lower exports to Russia and China.
Other BRICS nations boost China ties
Brazil also sought to boost bilateral trade with China, its largest trading partner, during a phone call earlier this month between Xi and Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva. China accounts for 26% of Brazil’s exports — double that of the US.
A highly symbolic appearance by Putin and Xi during Russia’s Victory Day parade in May underscored the deepening strategic alignment between Moscow and Beijing. More than 90% of bilateral trade between Russia and China is now conducted in yuan and rubles, according to the Kremlin.
South Africa, meanwhile, remains steadfast in its BRICS commitments, signaling its intent to chart its own course despite pressure from Trump.
“I think South Africa is not willing to reverse any of its BRICS commitments, especially around global governance reform, technology, agriculture, academic exchanges and business-to-business exchanges,” Sanusha Naidu, a senior research associate at the South Africa-based Institute for Global Dialogue, told DW.
Divergent ambitions within BRICS
Having grown from the original four to 10 members — with still undecided about joining — BRICS is now becoming increasingly fragmented due to diverging national interests, which could further limit its ambitions. It is also becoming more authoritarian.
Former Indian trade official Srivastava, who went on to establish the New Delhi-based Global Trade Research Initiative, said BRICS is “less about perfect unity and more about pragmatic cooperation in trade, finance and supply chains.”
While trade among BRICS nations has been increasing faster than trade between BRICS and G7 countries, much of it is in hydrocarbons. The intra-BRICS trade is, interestingly, subject to more barriers than those that exist between countries in the Global North, according to research by the Boston Consulting Group.
The consulting firm identified future signs that BRICS trade cooperation was increasing, including a rollback of anti-dumping and other trade restrictions, moves toward a BRICS-wide free trade agreement, unanimous support for reforms to the World Trade Organization and more foreign investment among BRICS nations.
Intra-BRICS trade set for further growth
While those ambitions may not materialize immediately, Mihaela Papa, director of research and principal research scientist at the Center for International Studies, expects intra-BRICS trade to take on more urgency.
“We can expect greater political support for new trade initiatives, ‘Buy BRICS’ campaigns and projects like the BRICS grain exchange and the expansion of local currency settlement mechanisms,” Papa told DW.
A Russian-backed proposal for a single BRICS currency to challenge the dollar remains on hold, suggesting a future shaped less by competing financial systems and more by a patchwork of overlapping networks.
Srivastava predicted that the dollar would stay “dominant for years, but parallel settlement systems in yuan, rupee and ruble will grow. This won’t dethrone the dollar,” he said, “but will steadily chip away at its monopoly.”
Edited by: Ashutosh Pandey
The post Will BRICS boom under Trump’s watch? appeared first on Deutsche Welle.
