First and most obviously: The government of Israel needs to rush, in abundant quantities and to immediate and undeniable effect, food and medicine to the places in Gaza that desperately need them.
This is as much a matter of self-interest as it is of humanitarianism. Few things hurt Israel more than the global perception, however tendentious, that it’s deliberately starving kids. Nothing helps Hamas more, either. Whatever benefits Hamas might derive from the aid pale next to the propaganda boon it has achieved through the starvation narrative — even if it’s Hamas itself that bears the final responsibility for causing and perpetuating Gaza’s misery.
But then what? There are three basic options.
The first is a negotiated settlement. Until just two weeks ago, the prospect of a cease-fire appeared to be tantalizingly close. Then Hamas hardened its stance. It has flatly refused to disarm until a Palestinian state is created.
It has also posted atrocity videos of two hostages, Evyatar David and Rom Braslavski, visibly starved and nearing death, which were guaranteed to spark anguish and outrage among Israelis, though the rest of the world barely seemed to notice. “Hamas does not appear to be coordinated or acting in good faith,” Steve Witkoff, the American envoy, said after withdrawing from talks.
A cease-fire now lies farther out of reach. France’s feckless and destructive plan to recognize a Palestinian state, along with promises from Britain and Canada to follow suit, was a guaranteed incentive for Hamas to raise the diplomatic price on Israel. What a perverse reward for the terrorist group, and a punishment for ordinary Gazans.
Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.
Thank you for your patience while we verify access.
Already a subscriber? Log in.
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
The post Where Can Gaza Go From Here? appeared first on New York Times.
