Iran’s foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, said on Thursday that the country’s nuclear facilities had sustained “significant and serious damages,” the first official acknowledgment of the extent of the damages caused by U.S. strikes on three nuclear sites.
The Atomic Energy Organization of Iran was still “surveilling the damages and losses,” Mr. Araghchi said in an interview with Iran’s state television. But, he added, “I have to say, the losses have not been small, and our facilities have been seriously damaged.”
That assessment painted a much grimmer picture than that laid out earlier on Thursday by Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, in his first public statement since the U.S. attack.
In a prerecorded video, Mr. Khamenei said that the attacks on Iran’s nuclear facilities “were unable to do anything important,” adding that President Trump’s claims that the strikes “obliterated” the nuclear sites were “exaggerated.”
Mr. Araghchi also suggested Iran might stop cooperating with the International Atomic Energy Agency, the United Nations’ nuclear watchdog, and threw into question whether inspectors from the agency would be allowed to access the country’s nuclear sites. He said Iran would not welcome a visit by the agency’s director, Rafael Grossi, at this time.
On Thursday, Iran’s Guardian Council, which has veto power over legislation in the country, approved a bill passed by hard-liners in Parliament that would effectively ban all cooperation with the I.A.E.A. in retaliation for the bombing by the United States of the Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan nuclear facilities over the weekend.
While President Masoud Pezeshkian, a moderate, must still decide whether to enact the law, Mr. Araghchi, his foreign minister, said the government would fully cooperate with the law. “Without a doubt, we are obliged to enforce this law,” Mr. Araghchi said in the hourlong televised interview. From now on, he added, Iran’s “relationship with the agency will take a different shape.”
Days after the strikes, several key questions about Iran’s nuclear program remain: What happened to the country’s 400 kilograms, or about 880 pounds, of enriched uranium, which would provide enough nuclear fuel for 10 bombs should Iran decide to weaponize it? Also unanswered: Whether any of Iran’s advanced centrifuges survived the strikes.
These are questions that U.N. inspectors could more definitively answer if they were allowed into the sites. They would also be able to confirm whether Iran was repairing its facilities and reviving its nuclear program, as its officials have said they intend to do.
Analysts say that Iran has little leverage left in any nuclear negotiations with the West, given the setbacks wrought by the U.S. strikes and the days of Israeli attacks on Iranian nuclear infrastructure and assassination of several top nuclear scientists. So Tehran may be trying to use cooperation with the I.A.E.A. as a negotiating card. It also serves Iran, experts say, to keep everyone guessing on its nuclear capabilities in the aftermath of the attacks.
“Iran wants to keep everything in the dark, to make sure they can play the diplomatic game of poker about the extent of the damages to the sites and the fate of the pile of enriched uranium,” said Sina Azodi, an expert on Iran’s nuclear program and an assistant professor of Middle East Politics at George Washington University. “Nobody knows exactly what is going on, there are many conflicting reports, and Iran is using the confusion to its benefit.”
Mr. Trump and Steve Witkoff, his special envoy to the Middle East who was leading talks with Iran, have said that Tehran and Washington would soon return to the negotiating table. But Mr. Araghchi said on Thursday that no such plans had been confirmed.
“Whether or not we return to diplomacy with the United States is now under consideration and will depend on our national interests,” Mr. Araghchi said, adding that no agreement had yet been reached with the United States to resume them.
“Going through a war changes many realities,” Mr. Araghchi said. “The situation before and after the war is very different, and diplomacy must adjust itself to this new reality.”
Farnaz Fassihi is the United Nations bureau chief for The Times, leading coverage of the organization. She also covers Iran and has written about conflict in the Middle East for 15 years.
The post Iran’s Foreign Minister Says Nuclear Facilities ‘Seriously Damaged’ appeared first on New York Times.
