Ramping up Europe’s defense spending has been a major demand by and his administration since day one. This goal has become potentially acceptable to almost all NATO countries thanks to Secretary-General Mark Rutte’s persuasive power, particularly after Germany, the biggest European economy, it.
Officials at NATO told DW that it’s about giving Trump a win but also “about rebalancing in the alliance,” as one senior diplomat put it, stressing that if that’s achieved, the summit would be a resounding success.
Lessons from the G7 in Canada
“Hopefully, Trump is not going to leave early like he did from the recent G7 meeting in Canada,” Jamie Shea, a former NATO official, told DW. This worst-case scenario is a big concern for some allies and something they want to avoid at any price.
Shea said he thinks “it’s important for Trump to be there to learn about all of the good things that NATO is doing at the moment, which help America’s security and not just Europe’s security.”
of GDP on defense is highly ambitious, and has the potential to transform societies in Europe: While in many EU countries, social justice and economic stability were the clear priorities for national governments for decades, in the future they might concentrate on strengthening military power and from the United States. This scenario has led to growing resistance in some parts of Europe.
How to deter Russia from attacking NATO territory
Asked about how he would explain his plan to citizens in Europe who are against social cuts in favor of new weapons, Rutte recently said that leaders need to act now because “otherwise, four or five years from now, we are really under threat and then you have to get your Russian language course or go to New Zeeland.”
Rutte’s idea is to and to allocate 3.5% of GDP to core defense needs and 1.5% to security-related investments. These investments include building broader roads and bridges that could carry heavy weaponry but also cybersecurity, measures against hybrid attacks, civil protection and aid for Ukraine.
Members of the alliance will try to factor in what they are already spending, for instance, on infrastructure, diplomats at NATO acknowledge. But they also stress that the fact that allies were able to agree on the exact definition of the 1.5% target is already a significant success.
Spain wants an exemption
The biggest challenge is getting everyone on board with the 3.5% target for core . Spain, which has the lowest military spending in the alliance, has signaled it wants a carve-out.
Other nations, like Italy, are demanding more time than the proposed seven years to meet the obligation. Many NATO members are ready to spend more but refuse to commit to yearly plans — a kind of control mechanism — also proposed by Rutte.
In the end, it comes down to NATO’s credibility, Lithuania’s former foreign minister, Gabrielius Landsbergis, told DW. The alliance “is moving in the right direction,” he said. But like many representatives of the countries on in proximity to Russia, he warns against not being serious about fulfilling the new spending pledge. “What if it is just to have a nice summit and everyone leaves happy, and then nothing really happens?”
A disappointing summit for Ukraine?
In addition, many Europeans are unhappy about the apparent lack of any ambition when it comes to Ukraine. While has been invited to the summit, his aspirations to join NATO are unlikely to take center stage at the summit.
There seems to be a zero chance for Ukraine’s NATO aspirations to be prominently featured in the summit’s final declaration. “Clearly, the United States in particular has wanted to play it down,” former NATO official Jamie Shea explained. “So, for Ukraine, it is going to be a rather disappointing NATO summit.”
There will be a sentence or two as a reference to in the final document, NATO sources told DW, but no new tough language, given the ongoing US attempts to get both countries to the negotiating table.
It’s all about Russia
Kristine Berzina, a NATO expert with the German Marshall Fund think tank, says it’s important to look at the bigger picture.
“We get so obsessed with the little declarations and paragraphs about such and such,” she told DW. What really matters is that “NATO is a strong political alliance and the people at the table believe in each other.” That is what she expects to be the summit’s strong message.
“Of course, it is about Russia. Talking about the ambitious new steps they’re going to take is a signal to Russia,” Berzina said.
Still, the summit declaration is expected to be “short and crisp,” as one diplomat put it, and the event is deliberately planned as a brief exchange not to bore Trump, who’s known for not being a fan of long speeches by others and of multilateral organizations in general.
A recipe to keep Trump happy
The big risk is that should the escalate, Trump may not travel to The Hague at all, according to media reports in the US. At NATO HQ in Brussels, diplomats say they do not have any indication that Trump won’t be there.
So, is the NATO summit just about pleasing Trump, as the program, including a dinner with the Dutch king, an invitation to play golf in the Netherlands, and the expected big spending splash, indicates?
In the end, it is about the Europeans, Jamie Shea said. “The 5% of GDP for defense spending is to deter Russia, to keep Europe and NATO citizens safe, sleeping soundly in their beds at night.” But he also admitted that “provided the decision on the 5% is taken, Trump should go back to Washington a happy man.”
Edited by: Rob Mudge
The post NATO summit in The Hague: A big win for Donald Trump? appeared first on Deutsche Welle.
