After days of publicly mulling whether to join Israel in its military campaign against Iran, President Trump directed the U.S. military on Saturday to execute a complex attack on three of the nation’s nuclear sites with several American warplanes and submarines.
Hours later, Mr. Trump declared the mission a “spectacular military success,” saying during a national address from the White House that U.S. forces had “completely and totally obliterated,” Iran’s nuclear program. “There’s no military in the world that could have done what we did tonight, not even close,” he said, standing in front of Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth.
It may appear like a tactical victory less than four hours after the bombs began to fall, but projecting any sense of finality about this ordeal is wildly premature.
The nuclear sites in Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan may be lying in rubble. But whether Tehran will be unable to rehabilitate its nuclear program remains an open question. And what will Iran do in return? If the more than 40,000 American troops and personnel in the Middle East are attacked, will the Trump administration try to topple the political establishment in Tehran?
Any one of these questions could have complicated answers with disastrous consequences for the United States and its allies throughout the Middle East. Mr. Trump doesn’t see it that way. “There will be either peace, or there will be tragedy for Iran far greater than we have witnessed over the last eight days,” he said, referring to Israeli airstrikes. “Remember, there are many targets left.”
Mr. Trump’s decision holds the potential to transform not only his presidency but U.S. standing overseas as well. He was elected to the White House on a platform of turning away from foreign conflicts with nebulous goals. A little more than seven months later, he’s brought the U.S. military directly into conflict with Iran in an act of war that was meticulously planned and detailed but entirely unauthorized by Congress.
The president chose to launch these attacks against Iran by choice, not necessity. Tulsi Gabbard, Mr. Trump’s director of national intelligence, testified in March that Iran had a stock of enriched material but had not decided to make a nuclear weapon. (She has since said her comments were taken out of context and estimated Iran was “weeks to months” away from producing nuclear weapons.)
In his speech, delivered after he told Americans via social media that he had entered the war, Mr. Trump applauded the bombing operation, which took place using B-2 Stealth bombers along with missiles launched from submarines. “I want to congratulate the great American patriots who flew those magnificent machines tonight and all of the United States military on an operation the likes of which the world is not seen in many, many decades,” he said.
It’s true that the U.S. Air Force had never used Stealth bombers in such a highly orchestrated, overwhelming strike operation. At about $2.1 billion apiece, the B-2 is the world’s most expensive aircraft because of its onboard technology. It was engineered to slip behind Soviet air defenses and obliterate hardened targets and has seen limited use during the wars in the Middle East.
The world’s eyes now shift to the American troops inside Iran’s range of fire via missiles, drones or other kind of attack. A response may not come for days. When Mr. Trump issued the drone strike in January 2020 that killed Maj. Gen. Qassim Suleimani, who led Iran’s powerful Quds Force of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps, it was five days before Iran launched salvos of missile strikes on U.S. forces stationed at bases in neighboring Iraq.
Mr. Trump said he hopes that “we will no longer need” the American military’s services. This is wishful thinking. It’s almost certain we haven’t seen the end of U.S. military action in this war. It might very well have just begun.
This Times Opinion work is funded through philanthropic support from the Carnegie Corporation of New York, the Outrider Foundation and the Prospect Hill Foundation. Funders have no control over the selection or focus of articles or the editing process and do not review articles before publication. The Times retains full editorial control.
The Times is committed to publishing a diversity of letters to the editor. We’d like to hear what you think about this or any of our articles. Here are some tips. And here’s our email: [email protected].
Follow the New York Times Opinion section on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Bluesky, WhatsApp and Threads.
W.J. Hennigan writes about national security, foreign policy and conflict for the Opinion section.
The post We Have No Idea Where This War Will Go appeared first on New York Times.
