The U.S. can no longer be considered a reliable ally for Britain and the other NATO members, former Russia adviser to President Donald Trump Fiona Hill said in a recent interview with British newspaper The Guardian.
“We’re in pretty big trouble,” the American-British national said during her interview about the U.K.’s vulnerable geopolitical situation. “We can’t rely exclusively on anyone anymore,” she said, casting doubt on Trump’s determination to tackle Vladimir Putin‘s aggressive expansion ambitions in Europe.
Why It Matters
Hill’s comments reflect widespread concerns in Europe that the U.S. is no longer the reliable ally it used to be for the continent, and European nations need to quickly get ready to fend for themselves, boosting military spending, forging new alliances or strengthening existing ones.
Earlier this week, most NATO members voted to endorse Trump’s demand for them to increase their defense spending to 5 percent of their GDP. But this goal might be hard to reach: already in 2023, NATO leaders agreed to spend at least 2 percent of their GDP on national defense budgets, but 22 of the 32 member states are still falling short.
During #DefMin, NATO Defence Ministers agreed an ambitious new set of capability targets to build a stronger, fairer, more lethal Alliance, and ensure warfighting readiness for years to comeTap to learn more ↓
— NATO (@NATO) June 5, 2025
What To Know
While Hill was born in England, she lived and worked in the U.S. for 30 years, ascending to the role of the White House’s chief adviser on Russia during Trump’s first administration.
Her role was cut short in the summer of 2019, when she was fired by the president, who later accused her of being “terrible at her job.” The dismissal followed Hill’s testimony at Trump’s impeachment trial, where she spoke of Russian meddling at the heart of the White House.
Since then, Hill has spoken repeatedly of Trump’s admitted admiration for Putin, criticizing his soft approach to the Russian strongman.
Hill said that Putin had “declared war on the West” through his invasion of Ukraine, which the Kremlin leader presented to his counterparts in China, North Korea and Iran as “part of a proxy war with the United States.”
But Trump, who has long admired the Russian president, appears unwilling to take a strong stance against him and instead “wants to have a separate relationship with Putin to do arms-control agreements and also business that will probably enrich their entourage further,” Hill told The Guardian.
While Trump has recently shown frustration with Putin, who has largely ignored or stalled on the U.S. president’s calls for an end to the invasion of Ukraine, he has remained reluctant to impose further sanctions on Moscow—a type of punishment that European leaders have instead embraced.
In a recent interview with The Telegraph, Hill said: “If you offer the Russians a carrot, they just eat it, or they take it and hit you over the head with it.”
What People Are Saying
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said in March: “If Europe wants to avoid war, Europe must get ready for war. By 2030, Europe must have a strong European defense posture.”
Though she recently insisted that the U.S. was still “an ally,” in April she said: “The West as we knew it no longer exists.”
France’s President Emmanuel Macron, who has long advocated for the creation of an EU army and boosting military spending, said in January: “What will we do in Europe tomorrow if our American ally withdraws its warships from the Mediterranean? If they send their fighter jets from the Atlantic to the Pacific?”
Earlier this week, President Donald Trump described a phone call with Putin as a “good conversation, but not a conversation that will lead to immediate peace.” During the phone call, he said, Putin said “he will have to respond to the recent [Ukrainian] attack on the airfields,” Trump wrote on social media, without adding whether he tried to sway the Russian leader from doing so.
On June 1, Kyiv launched coordinated, long-range strikes on multiple Russian airbases thousands of miles from Ukraine which took out more than a third of Moscow’s strategic cruise missile carriers.
What Happens Next
According to Hill, Putin sees the Russian invasion of Ukraine as a way toward establishing the country’s dominance as a “military power in all of Europe.” And the U.S., she warned, cannot be relied on at the moment to help Europe fight off this growing threat.
When it comes to defense, she said, the U.K.—and the other NATO members—should not rely on the military umbrella of Washington as they did during the Cold War, “not in the way we did before.”
A recent survey by the European Council on Foreign Relations found that Europeans are increasingly losing confidence in the U.S. from a geopolitical perspective. A majority, according to the study released in February, considered the U.S. a “necessary partner” rather than “an ally.”
The post NATO Ally ‘Can’t Rely’ Solely on US for Protection, Ex-Trump Adviser Warns appeared first on Newsweek.
