President Trump’s top economic advisers stressed on Sunday that they would not be deterred by a recent court decision that declared many of the administration’s tariffs to be illegal, as they pointed out a variety of additional authorities that the White House could invoke as it looks to pressure China and others into negotiations.
They also signaled that Mr. Trump had no plans to extend an original 90-day pause on some of his steepest tariff rates, raising the odds that those duties — the mere announcement of which had roiled markets — could take effect as planned in July.
“Rest assured, tariffs are not going away,” Howard Lutnick, the commerce secretary, said during an appearance on “Fox News Sunday.”
Asked about the future of the president’s so-called reciprocal tariffs, first announced and quickly suspended in April, Mr. Lutnick added, “I don’t see today that an extension is coming.”
The president’s tariff strategy entered uncharted political and legal territory last week after a federal trade court ruled that Mr. Trump had misused an emergency economic powers law in trying to wage a global trade war.
The decision would have put a quick halt to those duties, which form the centerpiece of the president’s strategy of pressuring other countries into trade talks. But an appeals court soon granted the government a brief administrative pause to sort out arguments in the case, which is expected to reach the Supreme Court.
In previous legal filings, the administration had said that an adverse ruling against its tariffs would harm negotiations and undercut the president. Top White House officials once promised to strike 90 deals in 90 days, but they have since managed to announce only one framework for a possible deal, with Britain.
On Sunday, though, the commerce secretary dismissed the notion that Mr. Trump had suffered a new setback, saying it “cost us a week, maybe.” He said the White House would ultimately reach “first-class deals.”
The decision has not slowed down Mr. Trump, who attacked China on Friday for failing to adhere to an agreement brokered between Washington and Beijing in which the two nations lowered their once-withering tariff rates, pending a longer-term deal.
The president also announced that day that he would double tariffs applied to imported steel, which would now be set at 50 percent, in a move that could result in higher prices for American consumers.
Kevin Hassett, the director of the White House National Economic Council, said Sunday that he expected Mr. Trump and China’s leader, Xi Jinping, could speak about trade as soon as this week, though he later suggested on ABC’s “This Week” that a conversation had not been scheduled or finalized.
Scott Bessent, the treasury secretary, separately reiterated that talks with China had stalled, citing the fact that Beijing is holding back its exports of rare earth minerals, which are critical for global industrial supply chains.
“Maybe it’s a glitch in the Chinese system; maybe it’s intentional,” Mr. Bessent said on CBS’s “Face the Nation.”
Mr. Bessent also defended the steel tariffs as a means of protecting American steel jobs. He acknowledged that it was unclear how the new rates could affect the construction industry, which he characterized as a “very complicated ecosystem.”
Tony Romm is a reporter covering economic policy and the Trump administration for The Times, based in Washington.
Alan Rappeport is an economic policy reporter for The Times, based in Washington. He covers the Treasury Department and writes about taxes, trade and fiscal matters.
The post Trump Aides Insist That Tariffs Will Remain, Even After Court Ruling appeared first on New York Times.
