Billionaire Jeff Bezos has decided to use his newspaper to propagate an outdated story that Americans like to tell themselves: that economic freedom equals human freedom. The myth of meritocracy might be designed to inspire striving, but in a country with the greatest income inequality in the developed world, it does something more harmful. It threatens Americans’ health, gaslighting people to believe that unchecked capitalism delivers personal liberty, when decades of research show it shackles people to financial and emotional insecurity.
Bezos announced on February 26 that The Washington Post’s opinion pages will be “writing every day in support and defense of two pillars: personal liberties and free markets.” The paper will not publish any viewpoints opposing his priorities, he said, while adding, “Freedom is ethical—it minimizes coercion—and practical—it drives creativity, invention, and prosperity.” For an editorial section that long prided itself as a marketplace of ideas, and a newspaper historically dedicated to holding the powerful accountable, this edict by a union-busting business mogul engaged in a pay-to-play scheme with a president who disdains the Constitution is bad for journalism and democracy and, perhaps most personally, Americans’ mental health.
I worked at The Washington Post from 2017 to December 2023, establishing the Opinion section’s first documentary film unit and pioneering a column about mental health and society. In 2021, I covered the January 6 attack at the U.S. Capitol as part of the team that won the Pulitzer Prize for Public Service. When I learned of Bezos’s editorial edict, I talked to former colleagues and learned of “heartbreak,” confusion, and anger in the newsroom. I also reached out to Post leadership for a comment on what defines “personal liberties and free markets” and who would be the arbiter of who deserved this freedom. No response.
What is happening inside the Post is, in some ways, a microcosm of the country. The “hierarchical, authoritarian nature of most workplaces”—often disguised by language about valuing people’s feedback—has been revealed, according to Seth Prins, assistant professor of epidemiology and sociomedical sciences at Columbia University’s Mailman School of Public Health. This forces people to confront the fact they don’t have much control under the current structure, which can be extremely stressful—and not just among D.C. journalists and government workers being targeted for cuts.
This is bad for Americans’ physical health, mental health, finances. Anxiety, depression, cardiovascular disease, and other stress-related disorders are all caused by precarious employment, overwork, unemployment, and lack of autonomy and control in the workplace. These problems are rife at another Bezos company: Amazon, the world’s second-largest employer. Corporate executives say they’re concerned about employee health and safety. The Center for Urban Economic Development notes, however, that the intensity, injuries, surveillance, burnout, and high worker-turnover rate at Amazon “should raise concerns about the potential long-term effects on wellbeing, medical costs, future employment and overall economic security.”
The system Bezos is championing has enabled the rich to get richer faster and the working class to burn out more quickly. And the assignment he’s given The Washington Post opinion pages is to make his story look good. There is a dataset that gives it credence: Since the 2020 pandemic, the U.S. economy expanded at a solid pace, wages have grown, and more people are working. But if you widen the lens to look at health, well-being, and human flourishing—some people’s definition of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness—the United States does “abysmally,” social epidemiologist Richard Wilkinson, a professor emeritus at the University of York in Britain, told me.
“The costs of the way the society works are absolutely horrendous,” Wilkinson said in an interview. “We must, at some point, get people to address that.”
Suicide and drug overdoses are leading causes of death in the U.S., where we’re strangled by an epidemic of loneliness—that heartbreaking mix of anxiety, depression, and fear that chips at our physical and mental health. The American mind—some might say spirit—is in crisis. Don’t blame Covid-19 alone. In the decade leading up to the pandemic, high school students’ persistent feelings of sadness and hopelessness increased by about 40 percent.
This isn’t an individual failing, and it can’t all be pinned on social media and cell phones, either. Wilkinson and Kate Pickett, his co-author of the book The Spirit Level, have found that in more unequal societies, kids do less well on math and literacy tests, teenage birth rates are higher, there’s more homicide, more people in prison, lower levels of trust and public engagement, and higher obesity rates.
Wilkinson focuses on what psychologists refer to as social evaluative threat. It’s measurable. In experiments, people facing threats to their self-esteem or social status show sharp spikes in cortisol, while other tasks have little effect.
“That’s what makes being lower down on the hierarchy so painful,” Wilkinson told me, noting that research shows people not only despise poverty, they despise themselves for being poor. Self-loathing and internalized shame can play out as violence and tension or conflict in the family, at work, and with authorities.
The rich may be able to buy their way out of some angst, but they can’t escape the stress of being judged. Plus, income inequality and low trust can breed resentment, which can inspire violence—and the fear of it. After the killing of UnitedHealth CEO Brian Thompson, several major health care executives reportedly increased personal security measures.
“Whether you are quite resilient or vulnerable to all the social anxieties,” Wilkinson said, “everyone is more worried about others’ judgments of them in more unequal societies.”
Censoring critiques of Bezos’s world-view, as is now the rule at Post opinions, doesn’t make the problems go away, though. Similarly, the Trump administration’s executive order to ban mentions of racism, inequality, and gender in scientific research will not erase them from our lives.
One can understand why it is trying, however. The illusion of truth can be powerful and effective. Misinformation about the 2020 election and the Capitol attack propagated by right-wing media helped President Donald Trump win back the White House. And in a Pew Research Survey conducted before the election, just 30 percent of conservatives said economic inequality is a very big problem in their country, compared with 76 percent of liberals.
When powerful elites control the information ecosystem, perception can feel like reality. But here’s the truth: Deregulation and tax breaks for the wealthy have enabled Bezos and his peers, including Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg and Elon Musk, to rack up $227 billion, $230 billion, and $359 billion in worth, respectively, according to Forbes.
These oligarchs would like people to believe that if you’re innovative and hardworking, you can achieve their success too. At the same time, however, they oppose labor rights and data protections, consumer safety, and regulations—the measures that shield Americans from exploitation and promote social mobility. So while the wealth gap grows, the poor and working classes are slipping down or stuck on the rung their parents stood on. Free markets and personal liberties are excellent ideas that can complement each other, but only when society collectively decides that dignity, health, and well-being are included in the definition of freedom.
“One of the major purposes of the ‘individual liberty’ language is to divide workers and make them think only of themselves,” Prins told me. “We know that actually we are stronger when we come together to demand what we want.”
Americans want to do better and feel better.
In 2022, 79 percent of Americans said they believe mental health is a public health emergency and needs more attention from lawmakers. And last year, a majority of Americans suggested they wanted the government to look out for people’s health and to regulate business to protect the public interest, according to a Pew Research Survey. But just 22 percent said they trust the government in Washington to do what is right.
It’s hard to trust the government to help people feel better when our culture blames individuals for collective problems. Bezos’s ideological pivot at one of the world’s most influential newspapers reinforces a false narrative that economic freedom and human freedom are the same thing and that it’s up to the individual to achieve both. At a time when economic anxiety, loneliness, and distrust in institutions are deepening, the shift is not just misguided—it’s dangerous. We need media that advocate for well-being, not gaslight people into believing their suffering is liberty.
The post Jeff Bezos Has a Very Billionaire-ish Idea of What Freedom Means appeared first on New Republic.
