On a different debate stage in 2022, then-Minnesota gubernatorial incumbent Tim Walz took his opponent, Republican Dr. Scott Jensen, to task on abortion rights. Jensen had recently shifted his tone on reproductive health care access, attempting to soften his rhetoric to appeal to voters. Walz wasn’t having it.
“My entire career, I’ve trusted women to make their health care decisions,” Walz said at the time, in their only televised prime-time debate. “I don’t believe anybody who sits in this office should come between them.”
“I just want to be absolutely clear: This is on the ballot,” Walz added. “It will impact generations to come.”
In just a few days, on October 1, Walz will once again take the debate stage—this time against another man who has tried to backtrack on his anti-abortion remarks: Ohio senator and Republican vice presidential nominee JD Vance.
In an interview with the Associated Press, Jensen, who lost to Walz by almost eight percentage points, discussed what it was like to debate Walz and how the governor and the senator should approach Tuesday’s face-off.
Jensen said he thinks that Walz will be “loud and clear” on the issue of abortion access.
“And JD Vance needs to make it very clear that there’s not going to be a federal ban on abortion,” Jensen added. “That’s what Trump has said, and they need to make that very clear.”
In the presidential debate earlier this month, three-time Republican nominee Donald Trump repeatedly failed to answer whether he would veto national abortion ban legislation if it came across his desk.
The Republican ticket has been running on abortion as a “states’ rights” issue—but even Trump doesn’t follow it. While in office, Trump voiced support for a 20-week federal ban and, while running this time around, he previously said he would be open to a 15-week ban.
“If I could just get a yes or no,” ABC News anchor Linsey Davis pressed Trump on the debate stage. “Because your running mate, JD Vance, has said that you would veto if it did come to your desk.”
“Well, I didn’t discuss it with JD, in all fairness,” Trump responded.
The former president has consistently bragged about appointing three of the five Supreme Court justices who repealed Roe v. Wade. Trump—with Vance following in line—has been shifting his rhetoric around abortion to appear less extreme on the issue. This week at a rally, Trump even claimed, baselessly, that women “will be protected and I will be your protector. Women will be happy, healthy, confident, and free. You will no longer be thinking about abortion.”
On a debate stage of his own in 2022, when running for Congress, Vance said that “some minimum national standard” on abortion “is totally fine with me.” After Texas passed its six-week ban in 2021, Vance heralded the legislation, saying, “We want women to have opportunities, we want women to have choices, but above all, we want women and young boys in the womb to have the right to life.” He’s also referred to the political movement for abortion rights as “sociopathic.”
On the campaign trail, Walz has continued to embrace abortion rights.
“Do you like the [policy] where women die because they can’t get health care that they should be able to get if they need reproductive care?” Walz said this month at the Macon-Bibb County Democrats’ headquarters in Georgia.
In January of 2023, Walz signed a bill into law that added a new layer of security to abortion rights, ensuring the state’s existing protections remain in place even if the composition of Minnesota’s courts changes someday.
During Walz’s speech at the Democratic National Convention in August, he cited his gubernatorial record on abortion rights.
“We also protected reproductive freedom because, in Minnesota, we respect our neighbors and the personal choices they make,” he said. “And even if we wouldn’t make those same choices for ourselves, we’ve got a golden rule: Mind your own damn business.”
As Walz is poised to push back on Vance’s history of anti-abortion remarks—and maybe throw a line about being a proud cat parent backed by Taylor Swift—Vance may turn to the governor’s handling of the 2020 George Floyd protests and his military record.
When asked if there was one issue Vance was hoping to bring up in the upcoming debate, he responded, “Minneapolis,” referring to the protests. “This is a guy who says he stands for public safety, but actively encouraged the rioters who burned down Minneapolis.”
Walz’s actions during the protests, according to a CBS News fact check, were much more complicated than Vance claims, and the governor has faced criticism from both conservatives and progressives.
During this campaign cycle, Vance, a veteran as well, has repeatedly questioned how Walz represents his time in the military.
Walz served 24 years in the National Guard before retiring in 2005 to run for Congress, and has employed this experience when calling for a ban on military-style rifles for civilians. He did not deploy to a combat zone as part of his service.
In 2018, Walz claimed that he had handled assault weapons “in war.” Later, following the backlash, the Kamala Harris-Walz campaign said in a statement to CNN that the governor had “misspoke,” adding that he “did handle weapons of war and believes strongly that only military members trained to carry those deadly weapons should have access to them.”
Vance has referred to his opponent as “Stolen Valor Tim Walz.”
During a speech to a union convention in August, Walz said, “I firmly believe you should never denigrate another person’s service record. Anyone brave enough to put on that uniform for our great country, including my opponent, I just have a few simple words. Thank you for your service and sacrifice.”
On X, formerly known as Twitter, Vance responded, “Hi Tim, I thank you for your service.”
“But you shouldn’t have lied about it. You shouldn’t have said you went to war when you didn’t. Nor should you have said that you didn’t know your unit was going to Iraq,” he continued, “Happy to discuss more in a debate.”
Like AP, The Columbus Dispatch spoke with the only Democrat who has debated Vance on stage: then-US Representative Tim Ryan. He urged Walz to not “let [Vance] get away with anything.”
“He’s able to semi-articulate some kind of intellectual underpinnings of Donald Trump’s rants,” Ryan told Dispatch. “He’s very smart. I don’t think there’s any doubt about that. I would never call him dumb by any means.”
Jensen also had some positive things to say about his past opponent.
“Tim Walz has an affable personality. I worked with him when I was in the Senate,” Jensen told AP. “He’s a jovial fellow. If you try to turn Tim Walz into something malignant, I don’t think that’s going to work. Because Tim Walz is not malignant. He’s a skilled politician who’s learned on the job.”
More Great Stories From Vanity Fair
Ta-Nehisi Coates on Efforts to Ban Between the World and Me
The Wild, True Tale Behind Monsters: The Lyle and Erik Menendez Story
Why Princess Diana “Ripped the Corset Out” of Her Iconic Met Gala Gown
MAGA Mega-Donor Tim Mellon Is Rocking the Family Boat
Life After The Prick: An Exclusive Peek at Bad Sisters Season 2
The Reported RFK Jr.–Olivia Nuzzi “Relationship” Casts New Scrutiny on All Journalists
How Mariah Carey Became the Queen of Christmas
33 Fall TV Shows We Can’t Wait to Watch
Team Harris vs. Team Trump: A Running List of Celebrity Endorsements
From the Archive: Dominick Dunne’s Menendez Trial Courtroom Notebook
The post Tim Walz Is Expected To Bring Receipts About JD Vance’s Anti-Abortion Stances To VP Debate appeared first on Vanity Fair.