UPDATE: Details of the plan were filed Friday in federal court in the Northern District of California.
“College athletes will finally be able to share in the billions of dollars their compelling stories and dynamic performances have generated for their schools, conferences, and the NCAA,” the filing said. “This is nothing short of a seismic change to college sports following more than four years of hard-fought victories in this case.”
The term sheet includes how nearly $3 billion in damages will be doled out by the plaintiffs over the next 10 years. Those payouts will vary drastically and are determined by sport played, when, how long and what conference an athlete competed in.
EARLIER: It’s a new era in college sports, as the National Collegiate Athletics Association and the five biggest athletic conferences have agreed to a $2.77 billion settlement of a class-action lawsuit, the Wall Street Journal reported.
Details are still being worked out, but what it means is schools can pay athletes directly, sharing with them a portion of the lucrative revenue streams for merchandising, TV rights, ticket sales and other deals.
The settlement agreement resolves a case that began in 2020. The lawsuit sought back pay for athletes, as well as a cut of future broadcast revenues.
Today’s settlement is the latest in the slippery slope of the last few years that has erased many of the rules that stood for a century or more for college athletes. While under-the-table payments from boosters has always been a part of the scene for top athletes, it was only recently that the landscape began to transform with the institution of name-image-licensing deals.
Some of those above-board deals can generate millions of dollars for individuals at the top of their game in various sports.
Now, the biggest barrier has been removed, and colleges can pay players directly without the shell game of NIL deals.
The new system will give Division I schools the ability to distribute roughly $20 million a year to their athletes, the WSJ reported, citing sources.
“All of Division I made today’s progress possible, and we all have work to do to implement the terms of the agreement as the legal process continues,” said NCAA President Charlie Baker in a joint statement with the commissioners of the five conferences named as co-defendants in the lawsuit. “We look forward to working with our various student-athlete leadership groups to write the next chapter of college sports.”
With the new rules, observers will wonder about competitive balance, at least in the revenue sports of football and basketball. The institution of NIL deals has already created a kind of free agency for athletes, who are now free to go to the highest bidder for their services.
“It’s long overdue and a long time coming,” said Jeffrey Kessler, one of the lawyers representing the plaintiffs, speaking to the WSJ. “It’s finally getting really close to a system that, for the first time, will treat the athletes the way they should be treated.”
The WSJ, again citing people familiar with the matter, reported there are two components to the tentative agreement. The NCAA has agreed to pay $2.77 billion in damages over a 10-year period. How this sum will be distributed is unclear.
Second, and most important, schools can pay athletes a portion of the revenue they help generate. The settlement agreement calls for schools to pay athletes 22% of the average annual athletic department revenue among schools in the top conferences. According to people familiar with the matter, that figure is roughly $20 million per school.
The WSJ, citing sources, predicted that the soonest the new system could take effect would be the 2025-26 academic year.
The post NCAA To Settle Class Action Lawsuit, Bringing $2.77B Windfall To College Athletes Past And Present – Update appeared first on Deadline.
