DNYUZ
No Result
View All Result
DNYUZ
No Result
View All Result
DNYUZ
Home News

Wait… All Those Studies May Have “Detected” Microplastics in the Human Body Because of a Severe Error

January 17, 2026
in News
Wait… All Those Studies May Have “Detected” Microplastics in the Human Body Because of a Severe Error

A deluge of research has painted a picture of our world being drowned in tiny, inescapable microplastics. Our guilt over plastic particles being found in even the most remote regions on Earth turned into paranoia once scientists started discovering them in our own bodies, too — riddling our blood streams, organs, and even our brains, stoking a rush of scientific inquest.

But now, there’s a growing contingent in the scientific community that’s casting significant doubts on these claims, The Guardian reports, criticizing the methodologies used in some of the most notable papers behind them.

One study published in the journal Nature Medicine last February claimed to have documented a rise in micro and nanoplastics (MNPs) in human brain tissues by autopsying preserved cadavers of people who had died between 1997 and 2024. But in November, another group of researchers contested the findings in a letter published in the same journal, criticizing them for “limited contamination controls and lack of validation steps,” per The Guardian.

“The brain microplastic paper is a joke,” coauthor of the letter Dušan Materić, from the Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research in Germany, told the newspaper. “Fat is known to make false-positives for polyethylene. The brain has [approximately] 60 percent fat.”

In reality, Materić suggests that rising obesity rates could explain the trend.

“That paper is really bad, and it is very explainable why it is wrong,” he added, warning that there’s serious doubts over “more than half of the very high impact papers” over microplastics in tissues.

One core issue arises from the prevailing method for measuring the mass of micro and nanoplastics. Called Py-GC-MS, it involves pyrolyzing the sample, or heating it in an oxygen free environment until it vaporizes. The fumes this process produces are then separated and measured so the nature of the original substance can be analyzed.

But as it turns out, the same fume signatures for the materials used in microplastics like polyethylene can also be produced from the fats present in human tissue. And while studies purport to chemically remove the tissues before subjecting the samples to pyrolysis, critics are skeptical that some traces aren’t being left over and producing false positives. This led University of Queensland environmental chemist Cassandra Rauert to conclude in a January 2025 paper that Py-GC-MS “is not currently a suitable technique for identifying polyethylene or PVC due to persistent interferences.” In all, the paper points to 18 studies that didn’t properly account for the risk of false positives.

“I do think it is a problem in the entire field,” Rauert added to The Guardian. “I think a lot of the concentrations [of MNPs] that are being reported are completely unrealistic.”

Another problem is that while the field of analytical chemistry has guidelines on how to analyze certain samples, these guidelines don’t exist yet for microplastics, according to Frederic Béen at Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.

“But we still see quite a lot of papers where very standard good laboratory practices that should be followed have not necessarily been followed,” he told The Guardian, such as measures for removing background contamination. “So you cannot be assured that whatever you have found is not fully or partially derived from some of these issues.”

The debate underscores how nascent the field of exploring the environmental and health impact of microplastics is, meaning it will take many more years of patient science before the dust is settled. At present, experts aren’t sure how microplastics affect our health, nor have they definitely proven that they’re harmful to us (though there are no shortage of studies suggesting they do). Still, no one can be blamed for being unsettled by the idea of having a plastic spoon’s worth of the stuff in their noggin, but if the skeptics are believed, maybe that claim is up for review, too.

“We do have plastics in us — I think that is safe to assume,” Materić said. “But real hard proof on how much is yet to come.”

More on microplastics: Doctors Find Evidence Microplastics Are Clogging Arteries, Leading to Heart Attacks and Strokes

The post Wait… All Those Studies May Have “Detected” Microplastics in the Human Body Because of a Severe Error appeared first on Futurism.

Indonesian plane carrying 11 people vanishes over mountains, search operation underway
News

Indonesian plane carrying 11 people vanishes over mountains, search operation underway

by New York Post
January 17, 2026

JAKARTA, Indonesia — A passenger aircraft carrying 11 people lost contact with ground control Saturday while approaching a mountainous region ...

Read more
Media

MAGA-Curious CBS Boss Greeted Trump With a Kiss

January 17, 2026
News

Media, take note: this is how you hold Trump to account over Epstein

January 17, 2026
News

Trump says the US will impose up to 25% tariffs on Denmark and other European countries until they hand over Greenland

January 17, 2026
News

Justice Dept. enters new territory with probe of Minnesota officials

January 17, 2026
Celebrity babies born in 2026: Meghan McCain, AD Smith and more

Celebrity babies born in 2026: Meghan McCain, AD Smith and more

January 17, 2026
How Trump is increasing pressure in bid to acquire Greenland — his next big move

How Trump is increasing pressure in bid to acquire Greenland — his next big move

January 17, 2026
What’s the Thing Only Ralph Lauren Can Bring?

What’s the Thing Only Ralph Lauren Can Bring?

January 17, 2026

DNYUZ © 2025

No Result
View All Result

DNYUZ © 2025