A barrage of post-shutdown data this week has left economists with more questions than answers about the state of the U.S. economy.
Unemployment rose to a 4-year high in November, inflation improved more than expected, and retail sales appeared surprisingly resilient in October — though economists say all of that is likely to be bogged down by low response rates, disruptions in data collection and other shutdown-related complications.
The result: More confusion about an economy that’s already confounded policymakers, politicians and business owners for much of the year.
“We knew we’d have to take this data with a grain of salt; I just didn’t know we’d have to make it this salty,” said Diane Swonk, chief economist at KPMG. “This week’s data really adds more confusion than clarity.”
Employment data on Tuesday showed a decline of 41,000 jobs in October and November, while the unemployment rate inched up to 4.6 percent, offering a sobering picture of an already slowing labor market. Two days later, the consumer price index came with more optimistic economic news: Inflation, it said, had cooled from 3 percent in September to 2.7 percent in November. But economists largely shrugged off both reports, saying they were unlikely to be reliable snapshots because the 43-day government shutdown had upended the way federal agencies gather data.
The Labor Department’s monthly household survey, used to calculate the unemployment rate, was scrapped altogether for October. The data for November was far less reliable than usual, with a survey response rate of 64 percent, the lowest on record. (Two years ago, by comparison, 70 percent of households responded.) As a result, some said they weren’t putting much stock into the 4.6 percent unemployment rate. It’ll take a few more months of data, they said, to get a better read on the job market.
“Yes, the unemployment rate rose, but I didn’t pay too much attention to it, to be honest,” said Kathy Bostjancic, chief economist at Nationwide. “The survey process was completely disrupted by the shutdown.”
That was also the case for Thursday’s consumer price index. Economists widely dismissed the figures, saying it was probably skewed lower by delays in data collection. Government officials didn’t begin tabulating prices until Nov. 14, when many items had already been marked down for Black Friday sales and other holiday promotions. More significantly, a third of the inflation index looks lower than it otherwise would because the government’s data appears to show no increase at all in rent and homeowners’ housing costs for October.
“This inflation data was flawed, at best — and I think it would be inappropriate to be making policy or investment decisions based off the November report,” said Joe Brusuelas, chief economist at RSM US. “We have definitely entered a season of noise in economic data that isn’t likely to clear until early spring.”
The next snapshot of the economy comes Tuesday, with a Gross Domestic Product report that is expected to show another three months of brisk growth between August and October.
The lack of clarity is a particular challenge for the Federal Reserve, which is looking to the job market and inflation for clues on whether it should continue lowering interest rates early next year. Fed Chair Jerome H. Powell last week cautioned that upcoming economic reports should be viewed with a “skeptical eye” because they “may be distorted by very technical factors.”
“We’re going to get data, but we’re going to have to look at it carefully and with a somewhat skeptical eye,” he said at a news conference this month.
Andrew Ackerman contributed to this report.
The post A new round of confusing economic data is muddying the picture appeared first on Washington Post.
