DNYUZ
No Result
View All Result
DNYUZ
No Result
View All Result
DNYUZ
Home News

Jury convicts Netflix director Carl Rinsch in $11 million fraud case

December 11, 2025
in News
Jury convicts Netflix director Carl Rinsch in $11 million fraud case
A side-by-side photo of Netflix and director Carl Rinsch
Netflix director Carl Rinsch, right, outside court Lloyd Mitchell, Getty, BI composite
  • A Manhattan federal jury found Carl Rinsch guilty of fraud.
  • Rinsh went to trial over $11 million Netflix gave him for a futuristic sci-fi show.
  • Rinsch’s defense attorneys described it as a “contract dispute” between him and Netflix.

A Manhattan federal jury on Thursday found Carl Rinsch guilty on charges that he scammed Netflix out of $11 million in a lavish spending spree.

After less than five hours of deliberation, the jury said it found Rinsh guilty on all seven counts, including fraud, money laundering, and illegal money transmission. He faces up to 90 years in prison, but is expected to be sentenced to far less.

Rinsch, wearing a purple-plaid tie and matching pocket square, looked straight at the judge as the jury foreman read the verdict.

The case centered on the millions of dollars Netflix paid Rinsch to film “White Horse,” a sci-fi epic about a world where clone-like beings, after a schism with humankind, create their own society walled off from the rest of the world. Rinsch testified in his own defense earlier this week.

Rinsch — a Ridley Scott protege who previously directed the Keanu Reeves-starring “47 Ronin” — shot footage for “White Horse” on two continents. But by the fall of 2019, he exceeded the $44 million Netflix budgeted for the project and asked for more money.

Through the end of 2019 and early 2020, Rinsch negotiated with Netflix to figure out how to move “White Horse” forward and realize his ambitions. He envisioned a franchise like “Star Wars” and “Game of Thrones,” complete with an elaborate fantasy world, that could become part of Netflix’s catalogue.

In March of 2020, the streaming service agreed to give Rinsch’s production company another $11 million.

Then, everything went wrong.

On the witness stand in Manhattan federal court, he said he believed the bulk of the $11 million was meant to reimburse him for keeping the production of “White Horse” afloat the previous fall, when it had gone over-budget. According to him, Netflix expected him to conduct only “soft pre-production” on a potential second season.

Netflix balked. Former executives testified in the trial that the $11 million was meant to go toward finishing a first season that Rinsch never delivered. According to prosecutors, the entire negotiation for the $11 million was a sham, and Rinsch meant to defraud the company all along.

At closing arguments on Wednesday, Assistant US Attorney David Markewitz presented the jury with a Buzzfeed-style list of “10 Ways You Know Carl Rinsch is Guilty.” In a slideshow, he walked them through what he said were Rinsch’s contradictory claims — on the witness stand, in emails and text messages, and in prior statements in a civil legal dispute with Netflix — that he said demonstrated Rinsch wasn’t telling the truth.

He argued it was absurd to think Rinsch’s lavish purchases — like a $439,000 handmade Hastens mattress — could not have possibly been meant for the production of “White Horse.” And Rinch’s 2021 purchases of Rolls-Royces were insured in his own name, rather than insured by Netflix.

“In a TV show, a mattress is going to be covered by sheets and a blanket,” Markewitz told the jury. “No one watching ‘White Horse’ from home is going to have any idea what is under those linens.”

Daniel McGuinness, an attorney representing Rinsch, told the jury that Rinsch never had the “intent” required to find him guilty.

He showed them emails and texts leading up to the March 2020 agreement that he said demonstrated Rinsch’s negotiating posture had always been that Netflix owed him about $11 million for reimbursement. Rinsch never said he would spend all the money on additional production for “White Horse,” McGuinness said.

In reality, according to McGuinness, the situation was a “contract dispute” based on misunderstandings between Rinsch and Netflix.

“They were talking past each other, and the government has turned it into a nefarious fraud conspiracy,” McGuinness said.

This is a breaking story. Please check back for updates.

Read the original article on Business Insider

The post Jury convicts Netflix director Carl Rinsch in $11 million fraud case appeared first on Business Insider.

‘Who’s Melanie?’ Stephen Miller’s wife makes awkward mistake trying to defend first lady
News

‘Who’s Melanie?’ Stephen Miller’s wife makes awkward mistake trying to defend first lady

by Raw Story
December 12, 2025

The wife of top Trump advisor and Trump administration immigration policy architect Stephen Miller made an awkward mistake Friday while ...

Read more
News

Interior designers share 5 bathroom trends that’ll be huge next year and 3 that will be out

December 12, 2025
News

‘Sentimental Value’ Actresses Describe Feeling ‘Limitless’ While Filming Acclaimed Family Drama

December 12, 2025
News

This Group Pays Bounties to Repair Broken Devices—Even if the Fix Breaks the Law

December 12, 2025
News

Gen Z is defiantly ‘giving up’ on ever owning a home and is spending more than saving, working less, and making risky investments, study shows

December 12, 2025
How Nobel laureate María Corina Machado escaped from Venezuela

How Nobel laureate María Corina Machado escaped from Venezuela

December 12, 2025
AI Is a Windfall for Utilities. It’s Also a Political Headache

AI Is a Windfall for Utilities. It’s Also a Political Headache

December 12, 2025
Banning Gender Transition Treatment Is Leading Kids to Do Exactly What You’d Expect

Banning Gender Transition Treatment Is Leading Kids to Do Exactly What You’d Expect

December 12, 2025

DNYUZ © 2025

No Result
View All Result

DNYUZ © 2025