The Justice Department’s indictment of James B. Comey for posting a photo of seashells has been roundly ripped by critics as a highly questionable move predicated on flimsy evidence that sacrifices prosecutorial credibility for President Trump’s fleeting favor.
But the charges, which department officials claim were justified by a genuine threat to Mr. Trump’s life, reflect the new realities of an agency whose roiled leadership is more focused than ever on the president’s restless efforts to exact vengeance on his enemies.
By firing Attorney General Pam Bondi — and then conspicuously declining to name her interim replacement, Todd Blanche, as the permanent successor — Mr. Trump has created an environment in which multiple officials seem to all be fighting for their jobs, according to current and former officials. The result is ever greater incentive to execute his increasingly extreme demands without much pushback.
Before ascending to acting attorney general, Mr. Blanche, a former Trump defense lawyer who wants the job permanently, gingerly cautioned the president against taking actions he considered unwise, unlawful or unsupported by evidence, current and former officials have said.
Unlike many political appointees at the Justice Department, Mr. Blanche, a well-regarded former federal prosecutor in Manhattan serving as the agency’s No. 2 official, defended local federal prosecutors who raised questions about the department’s ill-fated effort last September to indict Mr. Comey for lying under oath. Along with Ms. Bondi, he advised against the appointment of an inexperienced White House lawyer, Lindsey Halligan, as the U.S. attorney in the Eastern District of Virginia to ram through a prosecution of the former F.B.I. director.
As Ms. Bondi’s top deputy, Mr. Blanche also urged Trump advisers against arresting and escorting Mr. Comey in handcuffs last May after he posted an image of shells on a beach spelling out “86 47.” Mr. Comey said it was shorthand for politically nullifying, not killing, the 47th president, as many Trump supporters claimed.
Mr. Blanche is now all in on fast-tracking one or more prosecutions of Mr. Comey, according to people familiar with the situation who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss continuing investigations. He is exploring a range of other potential charges against Mr. Comey, who incurred the president’s wrath by authorizing an investigation into his 2016 campaign’s potential connections to Russia.
Details are scant. But prosecutors in the Southern District of New York, Mr. Blanche’s old office, are said to be examining a possible leak of sensitive material by Mr. Comey, according to a person with knowledge of the investigation.
Mr. Blanche and Ms. Bondi have long said they are simply reversing years of Democratic weaponization of the department by holding one of Mr. Trump’s persecutors legally accountable.
A spokeswoman for the Justice Department pushed back against criticism that the indictment had been brought to appease the president.
“This Department of Justice has always taken threats cases seriously,” said the spokeswoman, Emily Covington. “We pursue charges as soon as prosecutors and agents believe the evidence supports the charges.”
In bringing the Comey case now, Mr. Blanche might be seeking breathing room to keep Mr. Trump, who is focused on the war with Iran, satisfied that his campaign of retribution is in full motion. Securing an indictment on such a legally shaky case could signal he made a good-faith effort to punish Mr. Comey, even if the prosecution fails, according to current and former officials who requested anonymity to discuss internal deliberations.
It has become a familiar workaround. The historic aversion to bringing iffy cases to grand juries, trial juries and judges has receded in an environment where face-planting in court is preferable to facing down the boss.
A person close to Mr. Blanche said he would have sought to obtain an indictment regardless of whether he had been chosen as a permanent successor.
Trump Administration: Live Updates
Updated
- Senate bans prediction markets for its members and staff.
- Congress passes another short-term extension of expiring surveillance law.
- Hegseth testifies on the eve of a key statutory deadline for congressional approval.
Mr. Blanche’s critics say the indictment will haunt him for the rest of his career.
“The Comey indictment is a disgrace,” said Vanita Gupta, who served as associate attorney general in the Biden Justice Department. “The department has become Mr. Trump’s personal law firm, and Todd Blanche is all too eager to please his boss in a quest to lead it. None of this is normal.”
Mr. Blanche defended his actions during a brief news conference on Tuesday, hours after a grand jury in the Eastern District of North Carolina indicted Mr. Comey over what prosecutors called “a serious expression of an intent to do harm to President Trump.”
The indictment, Mr. Blanche said, was the result of a “tremendous amount of investigation.” He sought to cast it as just one of many recent cases the department has brought against people who made threats against public officials, including President Joseph R. Biden Jr.
“While this case is unique and this indictment stands out because of the name of the defendant, his alleged conduct is the same kind of conduct that we will never tolerate,” Mr. Blanche said.
Mr. Blanche was joined at the event by Kash Patel, the F.B.I. director, another senior Trump law enforcement official with an uncertain future and motivation to prove that he is aggressively investigating Mr. Trump’s perceived enemies.
In an interview with CBS on Wednesday, Mr. Blanche denied any political motives for bringing charges. He said that he had “absolutely, positively not” gotten his marching orders from Mr. Trump and that the decision to prosecute was based on an intensive yearlong investigation.
Mr. Blanche has also brushed aside questions about the department’s refusal to investigate instances in which conservatives used the “86” meme to target political opponents.
The Comey indictment is part of a broader effort that began this year under Ms. Bondi. It was intended to show Mr. Trump that a half-dozen or more investigations of great interest to the White House were progressing.
Other cases, particularly the investigation into John O. Brennan, the former C.I.A. director whom Mr. Trump has targeted over his role in the Russia investigation, appeared until recently to be more of a priority than the indictment against Mr. Comey in North Carolina.
But the three-page indictment, for all its flaws, has the virtue of being simple, making it a better candidate for fast action, according to a senior law enforcement official.
A prime mover on the case has been W. Ellis Boyle, the ardent Trump loyalist installed as the U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of North Carolina who has pushed for months to obtain charges, according to people with knowledge of his actions.
Ms. Bondi and Mr. Blanche decided to move ahead shortly before she was fired, after reading the prosecution memo prepared by Mr. Ellis, which contained new information about Mr. Comey’s conduct that has not yet been made public, they said.
Mr. Comey has vehemently denied he did anything other than express a political opinion.
“It’s really important that all of us remember this is not who we are as a country,” he said in a video posted after he was charged. “This is not how the Department of Justice is supposed to be. And the good news is we get closer every day to restoring those values. Keep the faith.”
Senior Trump appointees at the department, past and present, have been guided above all by the presumption that the wisest, and often only, viable path to survival is to take an approach of addressing an audience of one, with the aim of keeping the president happy, or at least at bay.
But the world outside that ecosystem is changing. The president’s approval rating is falling, prospects for a Democratic takeover of Congress are rising and the opinion of a lame-duck president is increasingly not the only one worth heeding.
If the seashell indictment pleased Mr. Trump’s base, it also exposed divisions among those in his coalition who support the free speech rights that Mr. Trump cited in his defense against claims he incited the mob to attack the Capitol.
“If the seashell thing is the best the D.O.J. has on Comey, we’re in trouble,” the podcaster Glenn Beck said during his broadcast on Wednesday. “I don’t buy Comey’s defense that, after years of prosecuting the mob, he thought ‘86’ only meant remove Trump from office. But will this really hold up in court? Is it just the only thing they’re willing to go after Comey on? I really hope this is just the beginning of a larger strategy.”
Jonathan Turley, a professor at George Washington University Law School who has been sharply critical of Mr. Comey’s actions in the Russia investigation, expressed disbelief that a grand jury in North Carolina would consider a post he called “adolescent” as a serious death threat not covered by the First Amendment.
“I have been one of Comey’s most vocal and consistent critics,” Mr. Turley wrote in an online opinion piece on Wednesday, adding, “However, he has a right to write out any hateful thoughts that come to him on his walks on the beach.”
A few hours after the column published, Ed Martin, the department’s pardon attorney and a frequent foil of Mr. Blanche’s, shared it online with a seemingly supportive comment: “Turley makes you think.”
Glenn Thrush covers the Department of Justice for The Times and has also written about gun violence, civil rights and conditions in the country’s jails and prisons.
The post Comey Indictment Shows Justice Dept. Got the Message From Bondi’s Firing appeared first on New York Times.
