DNYUZ
No Result
View All Result
DNYUZ
No Result
View All Result
DNYUZ
Home News

Eddie Murphy Almost Played One of Horror’s Most Famous Villains. Here’s What Happened Instead.

April 21, 2026
in News
Eddie Murphy Almost Played One of Horror’s Most Famous Villains. Here’s What Happened Instead.

Eddie Murphy’s work falls under many different categories, but horror, for the most part, isn’t one of them. And that isn’t to say he didn’t dabble in the genre a couple of times over the years. In 1995, Murphy teamed up with Wes Craven for Vampire in Brooklyn, though that was more of a horror-comedy than a straight horror film. And how do we feel about 2003’s The Haunted Mansion? It’s got ghosts, that’s for sure. However, it’s also a Disney flick geared toward children; not exactly something you’d expect to see on a list of great horror movies.

But according to several sources, Murphy had the opportunity to play a legendary horror villain a few years before Vampire in Brooklyn and turned it down. If the rumors are to be believed, Murphy was the number one choice for the titular role in 1992’s Candyman. Based on Clive Barker’s short story “The Forbidden,” the movie version delves into the legend of a Black man who was murdered over his relationship with a wealthy white woman. Whenever the name “Candyman” is said five times into a mirror, the hook-handed spirit of the dead man appears to exact revenge on whoever dares to speak his name.

Why Didn’t Eddie Murphy Play Candyman?

As for why Murphy supposedly didn’t end up doing it, one explanation is that the filmmakers couldn’t afford to pay him what he was asking. Another suggestion was that Murphy wasn’t tall enough to play the part. Tony Todd, who ultimately landed the role that was said to have been intended for Murphy, stands six-foot-five, whereas Murphy is only about five-foot-nine. But none of that appears to be true, and it may have been Todd who inadvertently sparked the rumor in the first place.

In an interview from Scream Factory’s Collector’s Edition release of Candyman, Todd claimed that the people at Propaganda Films, who produced the movie, were initially pushing for an “Eddie Murphy type” for the lead role—not Murphy specifically, though. He went on to explain that director Bernard Rose wanted a serious actor instead. For his part, Rose insists that Murphy’s name was never actually in the mix at any point. “That whole bulls—t thing that’s around about Eddie Murphy, there’s not a shred of truth to it,” he told NME in 2022. “It was never even talked about.”

If you ever run into Eddie Murphy in public, be sure to ask him about the whole Candyman ordeal.

The post Eddie Murphy Almost Played One of Horror’s Most Famous Villains. Here’s What Happened Instead. appeared first on VICE.

Legendary Television City may be be sold in further blow to Hollywood
News

Legendary Television City may be be sold in further blow to Hollywood

by Los Angeles Times
July 11, 2026

Television City, one of the most famous studios in the entertainment industry where generations of TV shows have been created, ...

Read more
News

Physical Signs You’re in the Wrong Relationship, According to a Therapist

July 11, 2026
News

New Doom Game Reportedly In the Early Development Stages Now At Id Software

July 11, 2026
News

CEO Pleads With AI Industry to Stop Charging So Much to Replace Human Labor

July 11, 2026
News

I attended one of the most popular FIFA Fan Festivals in the US. Here’s what attendees enjoyed about the party in Atlanta.

July 11, 2026
The Thinking About Kids and Heat Has Flipped

The Thinking About Kids and Heat Has Flipped

July 11, 2026
Trump’s ‘incredibly vulgar’ threat reveals secret tactic: Ex-State official

Trump’s ‘incredibly vulgar’ threat reveals secret tactic: Ex-State official

July 11, 2026
Most expensive World Cup venues revealed — with some costing fans eye-popping $100 for snacks

Most expensive World Cup venues revealed — with some costing fans eye-popping $100 for snacks

July 11, 2026

DNYUZ © 2026

No Result
View All Result

DNYUZ © 2026