House Republicans passed an eight-week measure to fund the Department of Homeland Security on Friday night, rejecting a separate deal that the Republican-led Senate passed earlier in the day.
The inter-chamber squabble is likely to lead to a continued stalemate over the department, which has gone unfunded since Feb. 14 — leading to long lines at some airports across the country — as Senate Democrats have already said they would not support the House’s proposal.
“The Republicans are not going to be any part of any effort to reopen our borders or to stop immigration enforcement,” said House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-Louisiana), arguing that Democrats are to blame for the deal cut with Republicans in the Senate.
Johnson called the Senate proposal “a joke” and argued that workers at the Transportation Security Administration would be paid while lawmakers wait for the Senate to take up the House measure.
President Donald Trump issued an order Friday to use preexisting funds to pay TSA agents. DHS said Friday that TSA agents would start seeing paychecks as early as Monday.
Johnson said that he spoke to Trump on Friday afternoon “and he understands exactly what we’re doing and why.”
The Senate bill would fund all of DHS, including the TSA, except for Immigration and Customs Enforcement and parts of Customs and Border Protection. The House bill would temporarily fund the entire department.
The House approved the measure late Friday night 213 to 203 nearly along party lines. Three Democrats joined with all present Republicans in voting for the funding extension: Reps. Henry Cuellar (Texas), Don Davis (North Carolina) and Marie Gluesenkamp Perez (Washington) — running in three of the most competitive House districts in the country.
Neither measure includes any of the new accountability measures for ICE and CBP that Democrats have demanded.
In a statement posted to social media, Perez said she voted for the bill “because I believe that it’s wrong not to pay people for their work.” But she added that it is “also foolish not to pay people for their work because you think it’s going to get you unattainable goals” and that she believes preexisting funding for ICE is plenty.
House Republicans have raised concerns that the Senate bill does not include the Save America Act — a sweeping voting bill championed by Trump that House Republicans have demanded the Senate pass — and that it would not appropriate money for the administration’s deportation efforts. House leaders also argued it would buy more time to negotiate with Democrats to find a full-year funding solution.
On Friday morning, House Freedom Caucus Chairman Andy Harris (R-Maryland) called the Senate’s plan “bad for Americans” and told reporters that his ultraconservative cohort would not support any funding bill that doesn’t include the voting measure.
But House Republican Conference Chairwoman Lisa C. McClain (Michigan) said in an interview with The Washington Post on Friday afternoon that the Freedom Caucus and other ideological factions within the party had come on board.
“It’s not perfect, right? Everyone has a little bit of their personal pet peeve or whatnot that they want in there, but everybody understands what we’re doing. We’re not going to get jammed,” McClain said.
She added that the House plans to leave town once it has passed the funding extension, though its members are ready “to come back on a moment’s notice” if need be. The chamber had been scheduled to leave Friday afternoon for a recess through April 13.
Democrats argued that their Republican counterparts should support the Senate deal, in part because ICE and CBP priorities are already funded through the Republican tax and spending bill, which appropriated $150 billion for DHS. The agency’s immigration enforcement agents have continued to receive paychecks throughout the shutdown because of the extra funding.
“Bring this bipartisan floor to the bill today, so we can end the nonsense end the chaos and actually start doing the type of things that the American people want us to focus on,” House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-New York) said Friday.
On the House floor shortly before the vote, Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas) argued that funding leaves civilian and support staff without pay and said “we should stand with Border Patrol, we should stand with ICE.”
The House’s proposal would need at least seven Democratic votes in the Senate to pass if all Senate Republicans supported it. Sixty votes are needed to overcome a filibuster. Senate Democrats have already said that’s not going to happen.
“Senate Democrats worked with Senate Republicans to reach a UNANIMOUS agreement to fund vital functions at DHS,” Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-New York) said in a statement Friday. An eight-week funding extension “that locks in the status quo is dead on arrival in the Senate, and Republicans know it.”
It’s not clear that Senate Republicans would support such a deal, either. A Senate GOP aide, speaking on the condition of anonymity to talk about internal deliberations, said there is a “zero percent” chance the Senate approves the House proposal.
The Senate passed its agreement by voice vote with only a handful of senators in the chamber in the early-morning hours Friday before leaving town for the previously scheduled two-week recess.
Democrats in Congress have refused to fund DHS until Republicans agree to impose new restrictions on federal immigration agents after two U.S. citizens were killed by agents in Minneapolis in January, sparking widespread outrage. The standoff triggered a partial shutdown of DHS starting Feb. 14.
Lawmakers have felt increasing pressure to strike a deal as TSA officers have gone unpaid and delays have mounted at security checkpoints in airports across the country, largely because of staffing problems at TSA.
In the Senate deal, neither Republicans nor Democrats would get what they want.
That bill is similar to legislation Democrats tried to pass weeks ago that would have funded DHS except for ICE, parts of CBP and the secretary’s office. Republicans blocked it several times because it did not fund the entirety of DHS.
Democrats secured none of the restrictions that they have been seeking, including some provisions that White House officials said they would accept if Democrats agreed to fund ICE, such as requiring federal agents to wear identification and body cameras and restricting them from operating near places such as hospitals and schools. Democrats also wanted to require agents to obtain judicial warrants before entering private property and to bar agents from wearing masks, among other demands.
“They got no reforms on DHS, which they could have had if they had been willing to work with us a little bit on that,” Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-South Dakota) told reporters.
Senate Republicans plan to use the reconciliation process — which allows the Senate to pass legislation with a simple majority and avoid a filibuster as long it complies with obscure budget rules — to send even more funding to ICE, according to Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina), the chairman of the Senate Budget Committee.
“What’s coming next is going to supercharge deportations,” Sen. Eric Schmitt (R-Missouri) said on the Senate floor.
Trump expressed ambivalence about Senate Republicans’ proposal to reopen DHS earlier this week, and he has repeatedly looked for ways to strong-arm the Democrats into folding. On Sunday, he wrote on social media that Republicans should not “make any deal” with Democrats until they support the Save America Act, which Senate Democrats unanimously oppose. That same day, he ordered ICE agents to deploy to major airports to help manage security lines, but the effort has done little to alleviate delays.
“They need to end the shutdown immediately, or we’ll have to take some very drastic measures,” Trump said during a Cabinet meeting Thursday.
Marianna Sotomayor contributed to this report.
correctionA previous version of this story misstated the magnitude of additional funding that Congress sent to ICE last year. It was tens of billions of dollars.
The post House GOP passes its own funding bill, rejecting Senate version, as shutdown drags on appeared first on Washington Post.
