TIME, in partnership with Statista R, the leading global provider of market and consumer data and rankings, has published the inaugural edition of the “World’s Top Universities of 2026” ranking. The quantitative study highlights institutions that drive academic excellence globally.
Methodology
This research project conducted a comprehensive analysis to identify top-performing universities worldwide. Eligibility criteria required institutions to be older than three years, offer bachelor’s degrees, and enroll more than 2,000 students.
[time-brightcove not-tgx=”true”]
Universities were shortlisted if they met at least one of the following conditions:
- At least one of the highly cited researchers, according to Clarivate, is among their faculty,
- They are among the most renowned and frequently mentioned institutions, or
- They applied through the open call to action published on TIME.com.
Statista R and TIME strongly encourage all universities to participate in this reporting process, with a particular appeal to institutions in countries with limited data infrastructure to submit information through this outreach. Institutions may pre-register to receive further information. Data gathered before November 28, 2025 were considered in the evaluation.
The analysis is structured around three key pillars: Academic Capacity & Performance, Innovation & Economic Impact, and Global Engagement. Institutions receive scores on each pillar, which are then aggregated into a final score used to produce the ranking. The three pillars are weighted as follows in the overall scoring model: Academic Capacity & Performance at 60%, Innovation & Economic Impact at 30%, and Global Engagement at 10%. This framework retains the classical components used in higher education assessments, such as the learning environment and academic output, while integrating measures of societal and economic impact and the international reach of institutions.
The ranking acknowledges key limitations in global university comparisons. Universities were able to submit data through the project’s reporting form. Submissions were cross-referenced during analysis. To mitigate regional or national reporting differences, universities were benchmarked relative to their own inputs and against country-level metadata. The resulting indicators were subsequently normalized at the global level.
Given uneven reporting across countries, the Statista R team combined secondary data from global sources and national datasets with primary data from university reports and data submissions to verify collected information.
To further reduce distortions arising from divergent reporting practices and regulations, output measures were evaluated relative to institutional inputs or to country averages. This means considering not only absolute performance but also the resources required to achieve it. Through this approach, Statista R constructed a global ranking that assesses universities’ relevance within their respective contexts.
In particular, the dimensions of Academic Capacity & Performance and Innovation & Economic Impact largely assess institutional impact in relation to inputs or institutional circumstances, while Global Engagement indicators capture universities’ international reach and positioning.
Scoring for Academic Capacity & Performance
Under the pillar of Academic Capacity & Performance, the study examines both the resources universities devote to teaching and research, and the results they achieve in terms of scholarly output and academic excellence.
Within the institutional learning environment, the study focuses on outputs that universities deliver for their students, relative to the resources available. These include per-student expenditure and the hypothetical number of students assigned to each faculty or staff member, based on data from nationally available databases of statistical agencies and/or ministries of education for the respective countries and supplemented with official university documents, such as annual reports and financial statements.
Accordingly, the study incorporates regional and national factors to contextualize academic performance and account for institutional starting positions, extending beyond purchasing power parity (PPP) to include additional relevant factors.
Much of the analysis focuses on academic performance indicators such as publication activity and citation impact, as well as the presence of highly cited researchers. Statista R incorporated additional data sources and contextualized results at regional and national levels such as Clarivate’s list of highly cited researchers, which is used to determine the share of a university’s faculty represented among the top researchers, and total institutional citation counts as analyzed using the non-profit project Exaly. To capture academic distinction at the highest level, the study also considers the presence of Nobel Prize and Fields Medal laureates among university alumni and staff.
Scoring for Innovation & Economic Impact
Statista R places particular emphasis on indicators that link universities to real-world innovation, labor-market outcomes, and globalization. In the overall scoring model, the Innovation & Economic Impact dimension measures indicators related to patents, open education offerings, and graduate outcomes.
Under the dimension of Innovation & Economic Impact, the study examines universities’ contributions to the advancement of science and technology, the diffusion of knowledge, and their influence on economic decision-making through the careers of their graduates.
For the innovation impact on technological advancement, Statista R cooperated with LexisNexis® Intellectual Property Solutions to analyze the quantity and value of an institution’s intellectual property portfolio. The scoring is based on the Patent Asset Index featured in LexisNexis® PatentSight+. This coefficient accounts for the impact that technological and other developments under the authority of the university have on global industry.
In addition, to assess the diffusion and external uptake of an institution’s knowledge and services, we use the total traffic to the university’s official web domain, normalized relative to country benchmarks, capturing the institution’s digital reach of its research, innovation, and economically relevant activities among prospective students, partners, and other stakeholders. Offerings of open-source courses and degree programs were also considered in the evaluation of universities’ contribution to global knowledge dissemination and to human capacity development.
One of the most challenging dimensions to assess is universities’ capacity to generate broad-based student outcomes beyond purely academic achievements. Outside academia, graduates influence economic decision-making and shape the societies in which we live.
Accordingly, the study examines the extent to which graduates attain positions of influence in business, thereby shaping the economy and everyday life. To do so, Statista R analyzed publicly available curricula vitae of top executive-level employees at companies listed on major global stock exchanges and identified their alma maters using company disclosures and other public sources. The results were then contextualized by institutional size (enrollment) and by regional benchmarks to assess the output of top-performing graduates relative to university scale and regional context.
Scoring for Global Engagement
The study evaluates the global engagement of universities by measuring the extent to which they attract international students and staff and the degree of international attention they receive.
The study measures key indicators like the proportion and total of international students enrolled at a university, with particular attention to undergraduate enrollment, and the proportion of international faculty, which captures an institution’s global character and the internationality of its teaching environment.
To assess international interest in each institution, Statista R looked at web metrics to evaluate how much traffic was on the university’s website and how much of the traffic was driven by international users. This includes both total website traffic relative to country benchmarks and the geographic distribution of visitors.
The 500 universities with the highest final scores are featured in the “World’s Top Universities of 2026” ranking by TIME and Statista R.
The post How TIME and Statista Determined the World’s Top Universities of 2026 appeared first on TIME.
