Size matters. We’ve all heard it. It’s a cliché that’s been floating around forever, but it begs the question, does it? Biologists have been wrestling with that idea for years. Not in locker rooms or comment sections, but in evolutionary journals, where the human body keeps presenting an awkward contradiction science still struggles to explain.
Compared to other great apes, the human penis is unusually large. Longer. Thicker. More visible. Chimpanzees and gorillas manage reproduction just fine with far less. If sperm delivery were the whole story, humans would look wildly overengineered. That mismatch has bothered researchers for decades because evolution tends to be economical. Extra traits usually earn their keep.
A new study published in PLOS Biology offers a clearer explanation. According to the researchers, penis size likely evolved under two pressures operating at the same time. Mate attraction and rival assessment. In other words, who you appeal to and who you intimidate.
Why Human Penis Size Is the Way It Is, According to Science
To test this, scientists presented participants with hundreds of anatomically accurate, computer-generated male figures. The models varied in height, body shape, and penis size. Women rated the figures for sexual attractiveness. Men rated them as potential rivals, judging physical threat and sexual competitiveness. The responses barely budged, whether people saw the figures projected at life size or on a screen in their own homes.
Women rated larger penises as more attractive, especially on tall, broad-shouldered figures. The appeal of a bigger package climbed, then stalled. Past a certain point, size stopped adding much.
The men’s ratings were a bit different. Men treated size as a straightforward indicator of competition. As size increased, so did perceptions of physical strength and sexual threat, and those judgments kept climbing as the trait became more exaggerated.
Men appeared to assign more importance to these traits than women. Funny enough, men consistently assumed that size mattered more to women than it actually did. Both sides noticed it, but not in the same way. Attraction always dominated competition by a wide margin for women.
Reaction time was interesting as well. Participants were extremely quick at judging figures with smaller penises, shorter height, and narrow torsos. Those fast calls suggest that certain traits are sorted in the brain before conscious thought ever comes into play.
The penis doesn’t define a person, and it never did. Sex and reproduction are its main purposes, and attraction still gets scrambled by culture and circumstance. What stands out is how much we were exposed as humans before clothing and cultural norms took over. People were openly seen, sized up, and judged.
Size, in this case, functioned as a signal. One read by potential partners. One scanned by competitors.
The post Human Penis Size Evolved for Two Reasons, Study Finds appeared first on VICE.
