The Australian state of New South Wales, of which Sydney is the capital, on Wednesday passed new laws that further restrict gun ownership and empower police to shut down protests, in response to last week’s terrorist attack on a Hanukkah celebration.
The state legislation comes just 10 days after the country’s deadliest mass shooting in decades, which left 15 people dead at Bondi Beach in Sydney. It is the first of a slew of actions the country’s leaders have pledged in the wake of the massacre to tighten gun laws, criminalize hate speech and crack down on groups spreading extremist ideology.
The slate of laws was passed at 3 a.m. after a lengthy debate. Chris Minns, the premier of New South Wales, acknowledged that they were “extraordinary measures” that would be controversial, but said they were proportionate and necessary steps to keep the public safe in light of the attack in Bondi.
“Sydney and New South Wales have changed forever as a result of that terrorist activity last Sunday,” he said at a news conference following the passage.
The new laws afford broad powers to police to prohibit and disperse protests for up to 90 days after an incident has been declared terrorism.
Those restrictions were met with concern from lawmakers, activists and some religious leaders that an unfair association was being drawn between the actions of the two gunmen behind the mass shooting, and the largely peaceful protesters expressing concerns about the humanitarian crisis in Gaza and criticizing Israel’s conduct in the war.
Authorities in Australia have said that the shooters, who displayed Islamic State flags in their car before launching the attack on families gathered at a Hanukkah event, were motivated by antisemitism.
The Australian Greens, a minority party, accused Mr. Minns’s Labor Party of ramming through the restrictions on protests along with the gun laws, which have broad support.
“The attack on protest will not make Australia safer, and is part of a broader false political narrative linking the actions of the appalling two terrorist shooters to a global movement to end violence, oppose a genocide and demand justice,” it said in a statement.
The organizers of pro-Palestine marches that have filled Sydney’s harbor bridge this year said in a statement that they would file a constitutional legal challenge, calling the law “draconian” and accusing Mr. Minns’s government of exploiting the attack in Bondi to quash dissent.
Mr. Minns said the law was about deterring “divisive, inflammatory” gatherings in the immediate aftermath of a terrorist incident. He said his government would also explore legal options to restrict the chanting of certain phrases, including “globalize the intifada.” Mr. Minns said some of the new laws, including the restrictions on protests, would take effect immediately.
“In these circumstances of heightened tensions, words can lead to actions,” he said.
Among the laws passed overnight were also measures to criminalize the display of flags of groups deemed terrorist organizations by Australia, including the Islamic State, Hamas and Hezbollah.
In New South Wales, Australia’s most populous state, the newly introduced gun restrictions will cap the number of firearms that can be owned by one individual to four, with exceptions for farmers and others in rural areas.
Sajid Akram, one of the Bondi Beach shooters who was killed by police, had six legally obtained firearms registered to him.
The state will also audit existing gun licenses and hold a gun buyback program along with the federal government, according to Mr. Minns.
Australians are broadly supportive of tighter gun laws, with three quarters saying they wanted more restrictions in a poll conducted last week.
Victoria Kim is the Australia correspondent for The New York Times, based in Sydney, covering Australia, New Zealand and the broader Pacific region.
The post Australian State Passes ‘Extraordinary’ Gun and Protest Laws After Bondi Attack appeared first on New York Times.
