A daughter of Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy denounced an “absurdly invasive pat-down” at a Transportation Security Administration checkpoint Thursday on social media, suggesting that if her father were in charge of the agency, he would try to abolish it.
In a series of posts on X, Evita Duffy-Alfonso claimed that she had nearly missed her flight after declining to go through the body scanner. Ms. Duffy-Alfonso, who said she is pregnant, said she waited 15 minutes for a pat-down. She said the T.S.A. agents, whom she described as “passive-aggressive,” tried to pressure her to pass through the scanner, insisting it was safe for pregnant passengers.
“All this for an unconstitutional agency that isn’t even good at its job,” Ms. Duffy-Alfonso wrote on X. “The ‘golden age of transportation’ cannot begin until the T.S.A. is gone.”
Ms. Duffy-Alfonso’s posts on Thursday build on past views she’s aired about the T.S.A. In June, she said in a post that the agency’s existence violated the Fourth Amendment, which protects people from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government, adding that the T.S.A. “needs to be abolished.”
“I should not be treated like a terrorist for traveling within my own country by an agency that’s trash at its job anyway,” she wrote.
As transportation secretary, Mr. Duffy leads the agency that oversees federal transportation projects and sets safety regulations for air travel, among other modes of transportation. He does not control the T.S.A., which is part of the Department of Homeland Security, led by Secretary Kristi Noem. Mr. Duffy often talks about creating a “golden age of travel,” which he recently said included dressing better while flying.
But if her father were responsible for the T.S.A., Ms. Duffy-Alfonso said in one of the posts on Thursday, he would “radically limit it and lobby Congress to abolish it.”
The T.S.A. was established after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, to make air travel safer. Before 9/11, passengers encountered fewer restrictions, and private contractors handled airport security. Travelers now face stricter scanning and a long list of prohibited items.
According to the T.S.A., all airport screening equipment, including metal detectors and body scanners, is safe for pregnant travelers. But passengers can opt out and instead receive a physical pat-down, the agency said on its website. The body scanners at U.S. airports rely on millimeter wave technology that uses radio waves, not X-rays. This type of technology emits far less energy than a cellphone, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
The T.S.A. has made several major changes to its screening process this year, including allowing all travelers to keep their shoes on and requiring Real ID-compliant documents for domestic air travel.
A T.S.A. spokesperson said the agency was “aware of the incident” and took complaints about airport security screening seriously.
The Transportation Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Ms. Duffy-Alfonso did not respond to a message requesting comment, and Mr. Duffy has not publicly responded to her posts.
Follow New York Times Travel on Instagram and sign up for our Travel Dispatch newsletter to get expert tips on traveling smarter and inspiration for your next vacation. Dreaming up a future getaway or just armchair traveling? Check out our 52 Places to Go in 2025.
Christine Chung is a Times reporter covering airlines and consumer travel.
The post After Airport Pat-Down, Sean Duffy’s Daughter Calls T.S.A. ‘Unconstitutional’ appeared first on New York Times.
