Despite having about a year’s worth of interviews — 11 to be exact — for an in-depth Vanity Fair story, White House insiders scrambled on Tuesday, suggesting to CNN that President Donald Trump‘s Chief of Staff Susie Wiles may not have known she was on the record.
The bombshell story prompted a White House meltdown and plenty of chatter in Washington, D.C.
“But obviously this has really left the White House and not just the White House, but Trump world as a whole in a state of shock,” CNN senior White House correspondent Kristen Holmes said. “I cannot tell you how many conspiracy theories I’ve heard about how this interview got published, whether it was the idea that she thought she was talking off the record, whether it was the idea that she was sitting for some kind of other interview that wasn’t going to be published immediately, that it has something to do with the 2028 campaign, because Susie Wiles is a calculated and political figure. Everything she does has meaning.”
The interview was an unusual move for Wiles, who generally has stood guard behind the scenes.
“She is not somebody who seeks the limelight,” Holmes added. “She doesn’t get out there in the press and do interviews. So the fact that she did this to so many people who are close to President Trump say that it must mean something. Now, of course, again, Wiles has said that that’s not the case, that it was just taken out of context. There was an omission in much of what she said. But again, this has caused quite a stir here at the White House.”
Social media users responded to the story and Wiles’ accusations that she might not have known the interviews were to be included in the story.
“Susie Wiles: What’s that recorder for? Reporter: Recording your answers. Susie Wiles: Right, like I’m going to say anything that’ll come back to bite me in the a–. Ha!” Chris Robinson, former referee and manager, wrote on X.
“Why would a chief of staff agree to an interview that she may now be saying she thought was off the record???. Under those circumstances it’s not an ‘interview,’” Duff Montgomerie, who described himself as a retired public servant, wrote on X.
“If you give multiple interviews to Vanity Fair and don’t know whether or not you are on or off the record – then you are not qualified to be a chief of staff. Speaking as a chief of staff,” Dj Omega Mvp wrote on X.
“Translation: CNN can’t believe Wiles would be that dumb,” college instructor Anthony M. Hopper wrote on X.
“Haha! So now Wiles & the White House want to follow the rules,” social worker and gerontologist Dolly Madison wrote on X.
“She’s been around long enough,” retired attorney and professor Howell Ellerman wrote on X.
The post Disbelief as White House suggests Susie Wiles may not have known she was on record appeared first on Raw Story.
