Generation “Z” — those roughly between 13 and 28 years old — is becoming our 21st-century version of the “Lost Generation.”
They’re often nicknamed “Zoomers,” a term used to describe young adults who came of age in the era of smartphones, social media and rapid cultural upheaval.
Males in their teens and 20s are prolonging their adolescence — rarely marrying, not buying a home, not having children and often not working full-time.
The negative stereotype of a Zoomer is a shiftless man, who plays too many video games. He is too coddled by parents and too afraid to strike out on his own.
Zoomers rarely date, supposedly out of fear that they would have to grow up, take charge and head a household.
Yet the opposite, sympathetic generalization of Gen Z seems more accurate.
All through K-12, young men, particularly white males, have been demonized for “toxic masculinity” that draws accusations of sexism, racism and homophobia.
In college, the majority of students are female. In contrast, white males — 9%-10% of admittees in recent years at elite schools like Stanford and the Ivy League — are of no interest to college admission officers.
So they are tagged not as unique individuals but as superfluous losers of the “wrong” race, gender or sexual orientation.
Gen Z men saw themselves scapegoated by professors and society for the sins of past generations — and on the wrong side of the preposterous reductionist binary of oppressors and the oppressed.
Traditional pathways to adulthood — affordable homes, upwardly mobile and secure jobs and safe and secure city and suburban living — had mostly vanished amid overregulation, overtaxation and underpolicing.
Orthodox and loud student advocates on campus — climate change, DEI, the Palestinians — had little to do with getting a job, raising a family or buying a house.
During the Biden years, white males mostly stopped enlisting in the military in their accustomed overrepresented numbers.
In Iraq and Afghanistan, they had died in frontline combat units at twice their percentages for the demographic.
No matter — prior Pentagon DEI commissars still slandered them as suspects likely to form racist cabals.
Gen Z males seemed bewildered by women and sex — and often withdrew from dating.
Never has popular culture so promoted sexually provocative fashions, semi-nudity, freewheeling lifestyles and careers of supposedly empowered single women.
And never had the rules of dating and sexuality become more retrograde Victorian.
Casual consensual sex was flashed as cool everywhere on social media.
And when it naturally proved in the real world to be selfish, callous and empty, males were almost always exclusively blamed as if they were not proper Edwardian gentlemen.
Soon, young men feared sexual hookups and promiscuity as avenues to post facto and one-sided charges of harassment — or worse.
For the half of Generation Z who went to college, tuition had soared, rising faster than the rate of inflation.
Administrators were often more numerous than faculty.
Obsessive fixations with race determined everything from dorm selections to graduation ceremonies.
Zoomers were mired in enormous student debt.
Yet they soon learned that their gut social science and “studies” degrees proved nearly worthless.
Employers saw such certificates as neither proof of traditional knowledge nor of any needed specialized skill set.
Unemployed or half-employed Zoomers then ended up with unsustainable five-figure student loans, and the insidious interest on them.
Their affluent, left-wing tenured profs, who had once demonized them as oppressors, could have cared less about their dismal fates.
Add it all up, and Zoomers puzzled their parents. And they found scant guidance from the campus.
Instead, they sought needed spiritual inspiration from a Jordan Peterson, entertainment and pragmatic advice from a Joe Rogan, but sometimes toxic venting from a demagogic, antisemitic Nick Fuentes.
What would shock the lost generation back into the mainstream, barring a war, depression or natural catastrophe?
One, an end to DEI hectoring and blame-gaming, and a return to class rather than race determining “privilege.”
Two, some sanity in the war between the sexes. When women represent nearly 60% of undergraduates, why does gender still assure an advantage in admissions and hiring?
Three, the federal government needs to stop funding $1.7 trillion in student debt, often for worthless degrees, and wasting away one’s prime 20s and 30s.
Let universities pledge their endowments to guarantee their own loans.
They should graduate students in four years. And they must slash the parasitical class of toxic administrative busybodies who cannot teach but can hector and bully.
Four, society needs to stop granting status on the basis of increasingly meaningless letters and titles after a name.
Skilled tradesmen like electricians and mechanics are noble professionals.
And their status and compensation should reflect their value to society — far more so than a bachelor’s degree or years vaporized in off-and-on college.
Finally, incentivize building homes, rather than overregulating and zoning them into unaffordability.
If the lost Gen Z is not found soon, the result for everyone will not be pretty.
Victor Davis Hanson is a distinguished fellow of the Center for American Greatness.
The post Here’s how to get Gen Z males back on the job and in the dating market appeared first on New York Post.
