As artificial intelligence companies gain political power and prepare to pour cash into the midterm elections, some of those worried about the dangers of an unfettered A.I. industry are setting out to raise tens of millions of dollars to back candidates of their own.
Talks have revolved around plans to raise about $50 million for a new network of super PACs that would back midterm candidates in both parties who prioritize A.I. regulations, according to four people briefed on the discussions, who insisted on anonymity to disclose the closely held plans.
The founder of the network, Brad Carson, a Democratic former congressman from Oklahoma, on Tuesday confirmed some details about its plans in an interview with The New York Times.
The super PACs are meant to counter a group called Leading the Future, which generally opposes strong A.I. regulations and has raised $100 million combined from Andreessen Horowitz, a prominent A.I. investing firm, and the family of Greg Brockman, a co-founder of OpenAI.
Leading the Future has chosen its first candidate to oppose in Alex Bores, a Democrat running for a U.S. House seat in New York who has championed A.I. safety legislation. Its allied nonprofit group said on Monday that it was planning a $10 million campaign to support the federal A.I. legislation.
In recent weeks, conversations about challenging Leading the Future have accelerated among employees at Anthropic, an A.I. company that favors more guardrails for the technology. The discussions have also included allied donors who are loosely tied to the effective altruism movement, a community of activists whose beliefs include concerns about the safety of A.I.
Anthropic, OpenAI’s main start-up rival in the United States, was started by a breakaway group of OpenAI employees who felt the company was insufficiently serious about protecting society from the dangers of A.I. Valued recently at $183 billion, Anthropic has at times been a thorn in the side of the Trump White House, which has generally pushed for acceleration of the domestic A.I. industry and dismissed safety concerns as coming from “doomers.”
(The New York Times has sued OpenAI and Microsoft, claiming copyright infringement of news content related to A.I. systems. The two companies have denied the suit’s claims.)
The goal of the new super PACs, according to Mr. Carson, is to raise $50 million initially, with some of the other people involved hoping to match the $100 million raised by the rival group. The new groups are so motivated to challenge Leading the Future, the Andreessen Horowitz-backed super PAC, that some allies have joked about naming their super PACs “z16a,” an inversion of Andreessen Horowitz’s commonly used nickname, “a16z.”
The money for the super PACs will come from a new 501(c)(4) group, Public First, which will not be required to disclose its donors. Public First will in turn plan to evenly fund one group for Democratic candidates, Jobs and Democracy PAC, and another for Republicans, Defending Our Values PAC.
Some money for the advocacy network is likely to come from Anthropic’s wealthy executives and rank-and-file employees, rather than from the company itself. A person close to Anthropic said the company and its executives were exploring various options for political engagement but had not yet decided on a group to support or deployed money into any groups.
Jack Clark, a co-founder of Anthropic, said at an event in Washington in September that “we are actively working” on a super PAC but did not offer details.
“There’s a huge community of companies and organizations that actually care about getting A.I. right,” he said. “And then there might be a community inside the technology industry that has a different view.”
Mr. Carson, who until this year served as the president of the University of Tulsa, said in the interview that he knew “having been a congressman, how influential big money can be.” So when he read at his home in Oklahoma about Leading the Future’s plan, he said, he thought that “voices that represent the public interest needed to try to do something in response.”
He added that “$50 million and 85 percent of the people on your side is more than enough to defeat $100 million, or even $200 million for that matter.”
Mr. Carson has been speaking to wealthy donors, including at Anthropic and even at OpenAI, about the idea ever since news of Leading the Future emerged in August.
Mr. Carson has ties to donors through two nonprofit groups he formed last year to sound the alarm about A.I. One group, Americans for Responsible Innovation, has backers that include the Omidyar Network, the main philanthropic vehicle of the eBay founder Pierre Omidyar, and Coefficient Giving, the vehicle of the Facebook co-founder Dustin Moskovitz, who is also a prominent effective altruist.
Mr. Carson is working with a former Republican congressman, Chris Stewart of Utah, on the new super PACs. Mr. Carson has also been consulting with Jay Shooster, a political strategist who has deep ties to the effective-altruist donor community, the people said.
Mr. Carson downplayed any support from the effective-altruism movement, saying that he did not identify with it and that it had “no involvement” with his group.
Money from the A.I. industry is poised to be a major story line of the 2026 midterms.
Companies like OpenAI are looking to take a cue from how the cryptocurrency industry achieved many of its goals after spending hundreds of millions to back Republicans in 2024. These businesses hope to defeat the likes of Mr. Bores and State Senator Scott Wiener, a Democratic candidate for the U.S. House in San Francisco who has also focused on A.I. safety. Mr. Bores and Mr. Wiener are likely to be early beneficiaries of the new super PACs.
But the A.I. industry, in contrast with the crypto industry, is not rowing in one direction politically. Some A.I. proponents also believe that the industry should not accumulate too much power, fearing that society will become beholden to the companies’ business interests.
The effective altruism movement is similarly well funded, but it has a damaged brand that makes political engagement tricky.
The movement counted the FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried as its most prominent adherent and donor, and it is still recovering from his campaign-finance scandal and criminal conviction. Mr. Moskovitz is now one of the country’s largest Democratic donors, but a representative for him said neither he nor his groups were planning to be involved with the new super PACs.
Cecilia Kang contributed reporting.
Theodore Schleifer is a Times reporter covering billionaires and their impact on the world.
The post Fears About A.I. Prompt Talks of Super PACs to Rein In the Industry appeared first on New York Times.
