• Latest
  • Trending
  • All
  • News
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Science
  • World
  • Lifestyle
  • Tech
In McGahn Case, an Epic Constitutional Showdown

In McGahn Case, an Epic Constitutional Showdown

January 13, 2020
America Is Now in a Race of Vaccination vs. the Variants

America Is Now in a Race of Vaccination vs. the Variants

January 25, 2021
Indianapolis Police Arrest Juvenile in Mass Murder That Left Five People, Unborn Child Dead

Indianapolis Police Arrest Juvenile in Mass Murder That Left Five People, Unborn Child Dead

January 25, 2021
WaPo’s top fact-checker, who claims Trump told 30,000 lies, won’t scrutinize Biden the same way

WaPo’s top fact-checker, who claims Trump told 30,000 lies, won’t scrutinize Biden the same way

January 25, 2021
With Russia Protesting Navalny’s Arrest, Calls Mount to Target Putin’s Inner Circle

With Russia Protesting Navalny’s Arrest, Calls Mount to Target Putin’s Inner Circle

January 25, 2021
California Lifts Stay at Home Order: ‘We Are Turning a Critical Corner’

California Lifts Stay at Home Order: ‘We Are Turning a Critical Corner’

January 25, 2021
A Minor Was Arrested For Fatally Shooting 5 People, Including A Pregnant Woman

A Minor Was Arrested For Fatally Shooting 5 People, Including A Pregnant Woman

January 25, 2021
Why Jennifer Lopez’s New Social Media Challenge Has the Internet Divided

Why Jennifer Lopez’s New Social Media Challenge Has the Internet Divided

January 25, 2021
MSNBC anchor Katy Tur pregnant with baby no. 2

MSNBC anchor Katy Tur pregnant with baby no. 2

January 25, 2021
RuneScape publisher Jagex acquired by The Carlyle Group for estimated $530 million

RuneScape publisher Jagex acquired by The Carlyle Group for estimated $530 million

January 25, 2021
Kourtney Kardashian & Travis Barker Are Reportedly Dating — Here’s The Scoop

Kourtney Kardashian & Travis Barker Are Reportedly Dating — Here’s The Scoop

January 25, 2021
EU medicines agency says hackers manipulated leaked coronavirus vaccine data

EU medicines agency says hackers manipulated leaked coronavirus vaccine data

January 25, 2021
Biden repeals Trump-era ban on transgender military service

Biden repeals Trump-era ban on transgender military service

January 25, 2021
DNYUZ
  • Home
  • News
    • U.S.
    • World
    • Politics
    • Opinion
    • Business
    • Crime
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Science
  • Entertainment
    • Culture
    • Music
    • Movie
    • Television
    • Theater
    • Gaming
    • Sports
  • Tech
    • Apps
    • Autos
    • Gear
    • Mobile
    • Startup
  • Lifestyle
    • Arts
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Health
    • Travel
No Result
View All Result
DNYUZ
No Result
View All Result
Home News Politics

In McGahn Case, an Epic Constitutional Showdown

January 13, 2020
in Politics, U.S.
In McGahn Case, an Epic Constitutional Showdown
645
SHARES
1.8k
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

WASHINGTON — “Has there ever been,” the judge asked, “an instance of such broad-scale defiance of a congressional request for information in the history of the Republic?”

It was the first Friday of the new year, and an appeals court was considering whether President Trump could order his advisers to refuse to comply with congressional subpoenas. The case concerned Donald F. McGahn II, the former White House counsel, but the questions from the judge, Thomas B. Griffith, made plain that the court was struggling with something more general and fundamental.

Judge Griffith was appointed to the court by President George W. Bush and is an authority on the separation of powers, having served as legal counsel for the Senate, including during the impeachment trial of President Bill Clinton. He wanted to know if there was any precedent for a wholesale presidential order to stonewall Congress.

“Has that ever happened before?” Judge Griffith asked.

The administration’s lawyer, Hashim M. Mooppan, gave an answer that underscored the significance of the case. “Not to my knowledge,” he said.

It can be hard to keep track of the lawsuits seeking information from Mr. Trump, his associates, his accountants and his bankers. Three of them are already before the Supreme Court.

But the case heard this month by a three-judge panel of the appeals court, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, is easily the most important.

The Supreme Court cases concern requests for information from private firms. The McGahn case is a constitutional standoff between two branches of government and presents a question that, perhaps surprisingly, has never been definitively resolved by the Supreme Court: May Congress sue the executive branch, whether to enforce a subpoena or for anything else?

In 2015, the Supreme Court left open, as Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg put it, “the question whether Congress has standing to bring a suit against the president.” She noted that “a suit between Congress and the president would raise separation-of-powers concerns.”

In November, Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, of the Federal District Court in Washington, ordered Mr. McGahn to testify about what House Democrats said was a pattern of presidential obstruction of justice. She said federal courts may resolve clashes between the other branches and rejected the administration’s argument that close advisers of the president have “absolute immunity” from congressional subpoenas.

The appeals court, acting in the shadow of Mr. Trump’s impeachment, has put the case on a fast track. After it rules, a Supreme Court appeal seems close to inevitable. The case may not be resolved in time to matter in the impeachment trial, but it may nonetheless yield a foundational ruling on the structure of the Constitution.

In its appeals court brief, the administration said the issues in the case were both momentous and novel. “For only the second time in our nation’s history,” the administration told the appeals court, “a court has ordered a close presidential adviser to appear and testify before Congress.” (The first decision, from a trial judge in 2008, concerned a subpoena to Harriet Miers, Mr. Bush’s former White House counsel. The two sides settled before the appeals court could rule.)

At the argument in the McGahn case, Mr. Mooppan, the administration’s lawyer, made two basic arguments, both sweeping. Mr. Trump and his close advisers, Mr. Mooppan said, have absolute immunity from congressional subpoenas, meaning they cannot be made to appear to be questioned about anything at all, whether or not executive privilege or some other protection might apply to particular inquiries.

But Mr. Mooppan said there was no need for the appeals court to decide that issue, as federal courts have no role in adjudicating disputes between the other branches. In 1997, he noted, the Supreme Court rejected a suit against executive branch officials from six individual lawmakers, saying they had not suffered the sort of direct injury that gave them standing to sue.

The D.C. Circuit, however, has said that “the mere fact that there is a conflict between the legislative and executive branches over a congressional subpoena does not preclude judicial resolution of the conflict.” It drew support from United States v. Nixon, the 1974 Supreme Court decision requiring President Richard M. Nixon to turn over tapes of conversations with aides, calling that “an analogous conflict between the executive and judicial branches.”

But the Nixon case arose in the context of a criminal trial, and the Supreme Court went out of its way to say that it was not “concerned here with the balance between the president’s generalized interest in confidentiality” and “congressional demands for information.”

Congress may have ways other than lawsuits to persuade or force the administration to comply, Judge Griffith said at the appeals court argument.

“Congress has plenty of remedies,” he said, including cutting off money or refusing to confirm nominees. “Appropriations power. Confirmation power. Impeachment power. There are lots of remedies that have been used for a long time. What’s wrong with those?”

Megan Barbero, a lawyer for the House, said those methods would not lead to getting the requested information in a timely fashion.

Should the appeals court decide that it has a role to play in the McGahn case, it will have to decide whether Mr. Trump’s close aides have “absolute immunity” from congressional subpoenas. The theory has been pressed by administrations of both parties.

An early articulation came in 1971 from William H. Rehnquist, then a Justice Department official and later the chief justice. He acknowledged that his views were “tentative and sketchy,” but he reasoned that it could not hurt the president to take a hard line.

“In a strictly tactical sense, the executive branch has a head start in any controversy with the legislative branch, since the legislative branch wants something the executive branch has,” Mr. Rehnquist wrote. “All the executive has to do is maintain the status quo and he prevails.”

The post In McGahn Case, an Epic Constitutional Showdown appeared first on New York Times.

Share258Tweet161Share

Trending Posts

Biden revokes Trump’s transgender military ban

Biden revokes Trump’s transgender military ban

January 25, 2021
As Biden Lifts a Ban, Transgender People Get a Long-Sought Chance to Enlist

As Biden Lifts a Ban, Transgender People Get a Long-Sought Chance to Enlist

January 25, 2021
Arizona State University Names Film School After Sidney Poitier

Arizona State University Names Film School After Sidney Poitier

January 25, 2021
Central African Republic surrenders war crimes suspect to ICC

Central African Republic surrenders war crimes suspect to ICC

January 25, 2021
The Metropolitan Opera Hires Its First Chief Diversity Officer

The Metropolitan Opera Hires Its First Chief Diversity Officer

January 25, 2021

Copyright © 2020.

Site Navigation

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Contact

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
    • U.S.
    • World
    • Politics
    • Opinion
    • Business
    • Crime
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Science
  • Entertainment
    • Culture
    • Gaming
    • Music
    • Movie
    • Sports
    • Television
    • Theater
  • Tech
    • Apps
    • Autos
    • Gear
    • Mobile
    • Startup
  • Lifestyle
    • Arts
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Health
    • Travel

Copyright © 2020.

We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled

Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.

Non-necessary

Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.